TY - JOUR
T1 - Sunitinib malate in the treatment of recurrent or persistent uterine leiomyosarcoma
T2 - A Gynecologic Oncology Group phase II study
AU - Hensley, Martee L.
AU - Sill, Michael W.
AU - Scribner, Dennis R.
AU - Brown, Jubilee
AU - DeBernardo, Robert L.
AU - Hartenbach, Ellen M.
AU - McCourt, Carolyn K.
AU - Bosscher, James R.
AU - Gehrig, Paola A.
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was supported by National Cancer Institute grants to the Gynecologic Oncology Group Administrative Office ( CA 27469 ), and the Gynecologic Oncology Group Statistical and Data Center ( CA 37517 ). The following Gynecologic Oncology Group member institutions participated in this study: University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Fox Chase Cancer Center, University of Oklahoma, Case Western Reserve University, University of Wisconsin, Women and Infants-Brown University, Central Connecticut Hospital, and Community Clinical Oncology Program.
PY - 2009/12
Y1 - 2009/12
N2 - Purpose: New agents are needed for patients with metastatic uterine leiomyosarcoma who progress after treatment with doxorubicin or gemcitabine-docetaxel. Agents targeting tumor vasculature have potential for activity in leiomyosarcoma. We aimed to assess the activity of sunitinib in patients with recurrent uterine leiomyosarcoma who had received one or two prior therapies by determining the frequency of patients who survived progression-free for at least 6 months or who achieved objective tumor response. We also aimed to characterize the toxicity of sunitinib and to estimate time-to-progression. Patients and methods: Eligible patients with uterine leiomyosarcoma were treated with sunitinib 50 mg by mouth daily for 4 weeks, with 2 weeks rest. Tumor response and progression-free status were assessed every 6 weeks. Results: Twenty-three of 25 patients enrolled were evaluable for efficacy (two wrong histologies). The median number of cycles was one. Two of 23 patients achieved a partial response (8.7%, 90% two-sided, binomial confidence interval (CI) 1.6-24.9%). Four patients remained progression-free at 6 months (17.4%, 90% two-sided, binomial confidence interval 6.2-35.5%). Toxicities included: grade 3 neutropenia (17.4%); grade 3 thrombocytopenia (13%); grade 3 anemia (17.4%); grades 3-4 lymphopenia (8.7%); grades 3-4 fatigue (30%); grade 3 vomiting/diarrhea (21.7%); skin rash/hand-foot syndrome, grade 2 (13%), grade 3 (4.3%); hypertension, grade 2 (39%), grade 3 (4.3%); grade 2 decrease in cardiac ejection fraction (4.3%), and grade 3 thrombosis (4.3%) Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 1.5 months. Conclusion: Sunitinib fails to achieve sufficient objective response or sustained disease stabilization as second- or third-line treatment for uterine leiomyosarcoma.
AB - Purpose: New agents are needed for patients with metastatic uterine leiomyosarcoma who progress after treatment with doxorubicin or gemcitabine-docetaxel. Agents targeting tumor vasculature have potential for activity in leiomyosarcoma. We aimed to assess the activity of sunitinib in patients with recurrent uterine leiomyosarcoma who had received one or two prior therapies by determining the frequency of patients who survived progression-free for at least 6 months or who achieved objective tumor response. We also aimed to characterize the toxicity of sunitinib and to estimate time-to-progression. Patients and methods: Eligible patients with uterine leiomyosarcoma were treated with sunitinib 50 mg by mouth daily for 4 weeks, with 2 weeks rest. Tumor response and progression-free status were assessed every 6 weeks. Results: Twenty-three of 25 patients enrolled were evaluable for efficacy (two wrong histologies). The median number of cycles was one. Two of 23 patients achieved a partial response (8.7%, 90% two-sided, binomial confidence interval (CI) 1.6-24.9%). Four patients remained progression-free at 6 months (17.4%, 90% two-sided, binomial confidence interval 6.2-35.5%). Toxicities included: grade 3 neutropenia (17.4%); grade 3 thrombocytopenia (13%); grade 3 anemia (17.4%); grades 3-4 lymphopenia (8.7%); grades 3-4 fatigue (30%); grade 3 vomiting/diarrhea (21.7%); skin rash/hand-foot syndrome, grade 2 (13%), grade 3 (4.3%); hypertension, grade 2 (39%), grade 3 (4.3%); grade 2 decrease in cardiac ejection fraction (4.3%), and grade 3 thrombosis (4.3%) Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 1.5 months. Conclusion: Sunitinib fails to achieve sufficient objective response or sustained disease stabilization as second- or third-line treatment for uterine leiomyosarcoma.
KW - Sunitinib
KW - Uterine leiomyosarcoma
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70350569370&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ygyno.2009.09.011
DO - 10.1016/j.ygyno.2009.09.011
M3 - Article
C2 - 19811811
AN - SCOPUS:70350569370
SN - 0090-8258
VL - 115
SP - 460
EP - 465
JO - Gynecologic oncology
JF - Gynecologic oncology
IS - 3
ER -