TY - JOUR
T1 - Summary statement novel agents in the treatment of lung cancer
T2 - Fifth Cambridge conference assessing opportunities for combination therapy
AU - Lynch, Thomas J.
AU - Blumenschein, George R.
AU - Engelman, Jeffrey A.
AU - Espinoza-Delgado, Igor
AU - Govindan, Ramaswamy
AU - Hanke, Jeff
AU - Hanna, Nasser H.
AU - Heymach, John V.
AU - Hirsch, Fred R.
AU - Janne, Pasi A.
AU - Lilenbaum, Rogerio C.
AU - Natale, Ronald B.
AU - Riely, Gregory J.
AU - Sequist, Lecia V.
AU - Shapiro, Geoffrey I.
AU - Shaw, Alice
AU - Shepherd, Frances A.
AU - Socinski, Mark
AU - Sorensen, A. Gregory
AU - Wakelee, Heather A.
AU - Weitzman, Aaron
N1 - Funding Information:
The symposium and educational proceedings publications were supported by educational grants provided by Genentech, AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Pfizer, Inc., Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals and Onyx, Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim and EMD Serono. Editorial assistance and CME Sponsorship were provided by InforMEDical Communications, Inc., Carlisle, Massachusetts.
PY - 2008/6
Y1 - 2008/6
N2 - The promise of effective targeted therapy for lung cancer requires rigorous identification of potential targets combined with intensive discovery and development efforts aimed at developing effective "drugs" for these targets. We now recognize that getting the right drug to the right target in the right patient is more complicated than one could have imagined a decade ago. As knowledge of targets and development of agents have proliferated and advanced, so too have data demonstrating the biologic heterogeneity of tumors. The finding that lung cancers are genetically diverse and can exhibit several pathways of resistance in response to targeted agents makes the prospect for curative therapy more daunting. It is becoming increasingly clear that single-agent treatment will be the exception rather than the rule. This information raises important new questions about the development and assessment of novel agents in lung cancer treatment: (1) How do we identify the most important drug targets for tumor initiation and maintenance? (2) What is the best way to assess drug candidates that may only be relevant in a small fraction of patients? (3) What models do we use to predict clinical response and identify effective combinations? And (4) how do we bring combination regimens to the clinic, particularly when the agents are not yet approved individually and may be under development from different companies? The Fifth Cambridge Conference on Novel Agents in the Treatment of Lung Cancer was held in Cambridge, Massachusetts, on October 1-2, 2007, to discuss these questions by reviewing recent progress in the field and advancing recommendations for research and patient care. New information, conclusions, and recommendations considered significant for the field by the program faculty are summarized here and presented at greater length in the individual articles and accompanying discussions that comprise the full conference proceedings. A CME activity based on this summary is also available at www.informedicalcme.com/cme.
AB - The promise of effective targeted therapy for lung cancer requires rigorous identification of potential targets combined with intensive discovery and development efforts aimed at developing effective "drugs" for these targets. We now recognize that getting the right drug to the right target in the right patient is more complicated than one could have imagined a decade ago. As knowledge of targets and development of agents have proliferated and advanced, so too have data demonstrating the biologic heterogeneity of tumors. The finding that lung cancers are genetically diverse and can exhibit several pathways of resistance in response to targeted agents makes the prospect for curative therapy more daunting. It is becoming increasingly clear that single-agent treatment will be the exception rather than the rule. This information raises important new questions about the development and assessment of novel agents in lung cancer treatment: (1) How do we identify the most important drug targets for tumor initiation and maintenance? (2) What is the best way to assess drug candidates that may only be relevant in a small fraction of patients? (3) What models do we use to predict clinical response and identify effective combinations? And (4) how do we bring combination regimens to the clinic, particularly when the agents are not yet approved individually and may be under development from different companies? The Fifth Cambridge Conference on Novel Agents in the Treatment of Lung Cancer was held in Cambridge, Massachusetts, on October 1-2, 2007, to discuss these questions by reviewing recent progress in the field and advancing recommendations for research and patient care. New information, conclusions, and recommendations considered significant for the field by the program faculty are summarized here and presented at greater length in the individual articles and accompanying discussions that comprise the full conference proceedings. A CME activity based on this summary is also available at www.informedicalcme.com/cme.
KW - Biopsies
KW - EGFR
KW - Lung cancer
KW - Novel targets
KW - Profiling
KW - VEGF
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=44649148421&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/JTO.0b013e318174e9d3
DO - 10.1097/JTO.0b013e318174e9d3
M3 - Article
C2 - 18520291
AN - SCOPUS:44649148421
SN - 1556-0864
VL - 3
SP - S107-S112
JO - Journal of Thoracic Oncology
JF - Journal of Thoracic Oncology
IS - 6 6 SUPPL 2
ER -