Submandibular gland transfer for the prevention of radiation-induced xerostomia in oropharyngeal cancer: Dosimetric impact in the intensity modulated radiotherapy era

  • Tugce Kutuk
  • , Nicole C. McAllister
  • , Amy E. Rzepczynski
  • , Andre Williams
  • , Geoffrey Young
  • , Meghan B. Crawley
  • , Guilherme Rabinowits
  • , Adeel Kaiser
  • , Jessika A. Contreras
  • , Noah S. Kalman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Submandibular gland (SMG) transfer decreased radiation-associated xerostomia in the 2/3-dimensional radiotherapy era. We evaluated the dosimetric implications of SMG transfer on modern intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) plans. Methods: Eighteen oropharynx cancer patients underwent SMG transfer followed by IMRT; reoptimized plans using the baseline SMG location were generated. Mean salivary gland, oral cavity, and larynx doses were compared between clinical plans and reoptimized plans. Results: No statistically significant difference in mean SMG dose (27.53 Gy vs. 29.61 Gy) or total salivary gland dose (26.12 Gy vs. 26.41 Gy) was observed with or without SMG transfer (all p > 0.05). Mean oral cavity and larynx doses were not statistically different. Neither tumor site, target volume crossing midline, stage, nor salivary gland volumes were associated with mean doses. Conclusions: Salivary gland doses were similar with or without SMG transfer. IMRT likely decreases the benefit of SMG transfer on the risk of radiation-associated xerostomia.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1213-1222
Number of pages10
JournalHead and Neck
Volume44
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2022

Keywords

  • IMRT
  • radiotherapy
  • submandibular gland
  • transfer surgery
  • xerostomia

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Submandibular gland transfer for the prevention of radiation-induced xerostomia in oropharyngeal cancer: Dosimetric impact in the intensity modulated radiotherapy era'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this