TY - JOUR
T1 - Subjective and objective measures of physical activity in relationship to bone mineral content during late childhood
T2 - The Iowa Bone Development Study
AU - Janz, K. F.
AU - Medema-Johnson, H. C.
AU - Letuchy, E. M.
AU - Burns, T. L.
AU - Eichenberger Gilmore, J. M.
AU - Torner, J. C.
AU - Willing, M.
AU - Levy, S. M.
PY - 2008/8
Y1 - 2008/8
N2 - Objective: This study compared accelerometry to self-report for the assessment of physical activity (PA) in relation to bone mineral content (BMC). In addition, we compared the ability of these measures to assess PA in boys versus girls. Methods: Participants in this cross-sectional study included 449 children (mean age 11 years) from the Iowa Bone Development Study. PA was measured via 3-5 days of accelerometry using the Actigraph and 7 day self-report questionnaire using the Physical Activity Questionnaire for Children (PAQ-C). Hip, spine, and whole body BMC were measured via dual energy x ray absorptiometry (DXA). Results: Partial correlation analysis (controlling for height, weight, and maturity) showed the Actigraph was significantly associated with hip (r = 0.40), spine (r = 0.20), and whole body (r = 0.33) BMC in boys, as was the PAQ-C (r = 0.28 hip, r = 0.19 spine, and r = 0.22 whole body). Among girls, only the Actigraph was significantly associated with hip (r = 0.18) and whole body (r = 0.16) BMC. Both the Actigraph and PAQ-C were significant in hip, spine, and whole body multi-variable linear regression models (after controlling for body size and maturity) in boys. Only the Actigraph entered hip BMC regression model in girls. Conclusions: Our study supports previous work showing associations between everyday PA and BMC in older children. These associations are more likely to be detected with an objective versus subjective measure of PA, particularly in girls.
AB - Objective: This study compared accelerometry to self-report for the assessment of physical activity (PA) in relation to bone mineral content (BMC). In addition, we compared the ability of these measures to assess PA in boys versus girls. Methods: Participants in this cross-sectional study included 449 children (mean age 11 years) from the Iowa Bone Development Study. PA was measured via 3-5 days of accelerometry using the Actigraph and 7 day self-report questionnaire using the Physical Activity Questionnaire for Children (PAQ-C). Hip, spine, and whole body BMC were measured via dual energy x ray absorptiometry (DXA). Results: Partial correlation analysis (controlling for height, weight, and maturity) showed the Actigraph was significantly associated with hip (r = 0.40), spine (r = 0.20), and whole body (r = 0.33) BMC in boys, as was the PAQ-C (r = 0.28 hip, r = 0.19 spine, and r = 0.22 whole body). Among girls, only the Actigraph was significantly associated with hip (r = 0.18) and whole body (r = 0.16) BMC. Both the Actigraph and PAQ-C were significant in hip, spine, and whole body multi-variable linear regression models (after controlling for body size and maturity) in boys. Only the Actigraph entered hip BMC regression model in girls. Conclusions: Our study supports previous work showing associations between everyday PA and BMC in older children. These associations are more likely to be detected with an objective versus subjective measure of PA, particularly in girls.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=49949101335&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1136/bjsm.2008.047779
DO - 10.1136/bjsm.2008.047779
M3 - Article
C2 - 18603581
AN - SCOPUS:49949101335
SN - 0306-3674
VL - 42
SP - 658
EP - 663
JO - British Journal of Sports Medicine
JF - British Journal of Sports Medicine
IS - 8
ER -