TY - JOUR
T1 - Study protocol
T2 - A cross-sectional survey of clinicians to identify barriers to clinical practice guideline implementation in the assessment and treatment of persistent tic disorders
AU - the Movement Disorder Society Tic and Tourette Study Group
AU - Martindale, Jaclyn M.
AU - Sarva, Harini
AU - Martino, Davide
AU - Gilbert, Donald L.
AU - Ganos, Christos
AU - Pringsheim, Tamara
AU - Black, Kevin
AU - Malaty, Irene A.
AU - Hallett, Mark
AU - Hartmann, Andreas
AU - Hull, Mariam
AU - Lee, Andrea
AU - Mir, Pablo
AU - Muller-Vahl, Kirsten
AU - Muenchau, Alexander
AU - Okun, Michael
AU - Parnes, Mered
AU - Set, Kallol
AU - Shprecher, David
AU - Singer, Harvey
AU - Smilowska, Katarzyna
AU - Szejko, Natalia
AU - van Wamelen, Daniel
AU - Worbe, Yulia
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Martindale et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
PY - 2023/7
Y1 - 2023/7
N2 - Introduction Eight members of the International Parkinson's Disease and Movement Disorders Society Tic and Tourette Syndrome Study Group formed a subcommittee to discuss further barriers to practice guideline implementation. Based on expert opinion and literature review, the consensus was that practice variations continue to be quite broad and that many barriers in different clinical settings might negatively influence the adoption of the American Academy of Neurology and the European Society for the Study of Tourette Syndrome published guidelines. Objectives 1) To identify how clinical practices diverge from the existing American Academy of Neurology and European Society for the Study of Tourette Syndrome guidelines, and 2) to identify categories of barriers leading to these clinical care gaps. Methods and analysis This article presents the methodology of a planned cross-sectional survey amongst healthcare professionals routinely involved in the clinical care of patients with persistent tic disorders, aimed at 1) identifying how practices diverge from the published guidelines; and 2) identifying categories of barriers leading to these clinical care gaps. Purposeful sampling methods are used to identify and recruit critical persistent tic disorders stakeholders. The analysis will use descriptive statistics.
AB - Introduction Eight members of the International Parkinson's Disease and Movement Disorders Society Tic and Tourette Syndrome Study Group formed a subcommittee to discuss further barriers to practice guideline implementation. Based on expert opinion and literature review, the consensus was that practice variations continue to be quite broad and that many barriers in different clinical settings might negatively influence the adoption of the American Academy of Neurology and the European Society for the Study of Tourette Syndrome published guidelines. Objectives 1) To identify how clinical practices diverge from the existing American Academy of Neurology and European Society for the Study of Tourette Syndrome guidelines, and 2) to identify categories of barriers leading to these clinical care gaps. Methods and analysis This article presents the methodology of a planned cross-sectional survey amongst healthcare professionals routinely involved in the clinical care of patients with persistent tic disorders, aimed at 1) identifying how practices diverge from the published guidelines; and 2) identifying categories of barriers leading to these clinical care gaps. Purposeful sampling methods are used to identify and recruit critical persistent tic disorders stakeholders. The analysis will use descriptive statistics.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85165314643&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0288408
DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0288408
M3 - Article
C2 - 37467237
AN - SCOPUS:85165314643
SN - 1932-6203
VL - 18
JO - PloS one
JF - PloS one
IS - 7 July
M1 - e0288408
ER -