Study Characteristics and Impact of Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America Annual Meeting’s “Best Papers” From 2009 to 2019

Guillermo Marquez, Caroline Granger, Justin A. Cline, Charles A. Goldfarb, Lindley B. Wall

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Objective: Award-winning abstracts are selected every year at the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America (POSNA) annual meeting as “best paper” or poster. It is unknown how many achieve publication in peer-reviewed journals and the impact they have. We sought to determine the characteristics, including the level of evidence (LoE), publication rates, and the impact of award-winning abstracts on pediatric orthopaedic surgery practice from 2009 to 2019. Methods: Award-winning abstracts or “best papers” from 2009 to 2019 were retrospectively reviewed from the POSNA website from abstract publication to manuscript publication. A search across Pubmed was used to match abstracts to their publications by comparing author names, titles, study design and methodology, results, and conclusions. Area of focus, abstract authors, institutions, publication status, LoE, time to publication, authors of publication, journals of publication, and the journal’s latest Hirsch Index and impact factor were recorded. Results: There have been 54 “best papers” at the POSNA annual meeting from 2009 to 2019. Of those, 39 have been published across 17 different journals for a publication rate of 72%. The average time from abstract presentation to publication was 21.2 months with a range of 0 to 121 months. Of the published award-winning abstracts, 64% (25) were published within 2 years, 87% (34) within 3 years, and 95% (37) within 4 years. Out of the published abstracts, 26% (10) were in the Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics, 23% (9) were in the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, and 10% (4) were in the Journal of Child Orthopaedics. The median number of abstract authors was 4 and increased to a median of 6 authors once published. Most award-winning abstracts had a LoE of 3. The average journal impact factor for all publications was 4; the average Hirsch Index for the corresponding author was 29.9, and the average number of citations for a publication was 41 with a range of 0 to 270. Conclusions: The majority of the “best papers” presented at POSNA annual meetings from 2009 to 2019 were published in peer-reviewed journals within 2 years of presentation, with approximately half being published in the Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics or Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. The publication rate of “best papers” at the POSNA annual meeting was found to be higher than rates reported for abstracts presented at the annual meetings of POSNA, American Society for Surgery of the Hand and European Pediatric Orthopaedic Society, but similar to the rates observed for American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons, American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, and Orthopaedic Trauma Association. Most of the selected “best papers” at the POSNA annual meeting are published and have a substantial impact on pediatric orthopaedic surgery practice.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)286-290
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Pediatric Orthopaedics
Volume44
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2024

Keywords

  • POSNA annual meeting
  • best abstracts
  • best papers
  • impact
  • publication rate

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Study Characteristics and Impact of Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America Annual Meeting’s “Best Papers” From 2009 to 2019'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this