TY - JOUR
T1 - Structural tuning of anisotropic mechanical properties in 3D-Printed hydrogel lattices
AU - Yoon, Daniel
AU - Eckstein, Kevin N.
AU - Ruding, Margrethe
AU - Bayly, Philip V.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2024/9
Y1 - 2024/9
N2 - We investigated the ability to tune the anisotropic mechanical properties of 3D-printed hydrogel lattices by modifying their geometry (lattice strut diameter, unit cell size, and unit cell scaling factor). Many soft tissues are anisotropic and the ability to mimic natural anisotropy would be valuable for developing tissue-surrogate “phantoms” for elasticity imaging (shear wave elastography or magnetic resonance elastography). Vintile lattices were 3D-printed in polyethylene glycol di-acrylate (PEGDA) using digital light projection printing. Two mechanical benchtop tests, dynamic shear testing and unconfined compression, were used to measure the apparent shear storage moduli (G′) and apparent Young's moduli (E) of lattice samples. Increasing the unit cell size from 1.25 mm to 2.00 mm reduced the Young's and shear moduli of the lattices by 91% and 85%, respectively. Decreasing the strut diameter from 300 μm to 200 μm reduced the apparent shear moduli of the lattices by 95%. Increasing the geometric scaling ratio of the lattice unit cells from 1.00 × to 2.00 × increased mechanical anisotropy in shear (by a factor of 3.1) and in compression (by a factor of 2.9). Both simulations and experiments show that the effects of unit cell size and strut diameter are consistent with power law relationships between volume fraction and apparent elastic moduli. In particular, experimental measurements of apparent Young's moduli agree well with predictions of the theoretical Gibson-Ashby model. Thus, the anisotropic mechanical properties of a lattice can be tuned by the unit cell size, the strut diameter, and scaling factors. This approach will be valuable in designing tissue-mimicking hydrogel lattice-based composite materials for elastography phantoms and tissue engineered scaffolds.
AB - We investigated the ability to tune the anisotropic mechanical properties of 3D-printed hydrogel lattices by modifying their geometry (lattice strut diameter, unit cell size, and unit cell scaling factor). Many soft tissues are anisotropic and the ability to mimic natural anisotropy would be valuable for developing tissue-surrogate “phantoms” for elasticity imaging (shear wave elastography or magnetic resonance elastography). Vintile lattices were 3D-printed in polyethylene glycol di-acrylate (PEGDA) using digital light projection printing. Two mechanical benchtop tests, dynamic shear testing and unconfined compression, were used to measure the apparent shear storage moduli (G′) and apparent Young's moduli (E) of lattice samples. Increasing the unit cell size from 1.25 mm to 2.00 mm reduced the Young's and shear moduli of the lattices by 91% and 85%, respectively. Decreasing the strut diameter from 300 μm to 200 μm reduced the apparent shear moduli of the lattices by 95%. Increasing the geometric scaling ratio of the lattice unit cells from 1.00 × to 2.00 × increased mechanical anisotropy in shear (by a factor of 3.1) and in compression (by a factor of 2.9). Both simulations and experiments show that the effects of unit cell size and strut diameter are consistent with power law relationships between volume fraction and apparent elastic moduli. In particular, experimental measurements of apparent Young's moduli agree well with predictions of the theoretical Gibson-Ashby model. Thus, the anisotropic mechanical properties of a lattice can be tuned by the unit cell size, the strut diameter, and scaling factors. This approach will be valuable in designing tissue-mimicking hydrogel lattice-based composite materials for elastography phantoms and tissue engineered scaffolds.
KW - Anisotropy
KW - Digital light projection (DLP) printing
KW - Gibson-Ashby model
KW - Hydrogel lattices
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85196756099&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2024.106625
DO - 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2024.106625
M3 - Article
C2 - 38924921
AN - SCOPUS:85196756099
SN - 1751-6161
VL - 157
JO - Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
JF - Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
M1 - 106625
ER -