TY - JOUR
T1 - Stoma creation through the stoma site
T2 - A rapid, safe technique
AU - Stephenson, Edward R.
AU - Ilahi, Obeid
AU - Koltun, Walter A.
PY - 1997/1/1
Y1 - 1997/1/1
N2 - Stoma creation often involves a separate laparotomy incision. Recently, laparoscopy was suggested to minimize the morbidity associated with conventional open stomal techniques. We describe and evaluate a technique of stoma creation done directly through the stoma site, avoiding both laparotomy and laparoscopy. METHODS: Charts of 36 patients who underwent attempted stoma creation using this closed technique were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: A total of 32 patients had stomas successfully created in this fashion (closed group); although four patients failed and required laparotomy (open group), there was an overall success rate of 89 percent. Blood loss (17 ± 5 vs. 350 ± 130 ml; P < .001), operative time (52 ± 8 vs. 169 ± 35 minutes; P < 0.001), and complications (3/32 vs. 4/4; P < 0.001) favored the closed group. No factor, including diagnosis, obesity, or previous abdominal surgery were identified that contraindicated use of the closed technique. CONCLUSIONS: Stomas can be safely made in a high proportion of patients without the need for laparotomy or laparoscopy. Failure of the closed technique identifies a group of patients who have a high associated operative time, blood loss, and morbidity when laparotomy is used for stoma creation and in whom laparoscopic procedures may improve results.
AB - Stoma creation often involves a separate laparotomy incision. Recently, laparoscopy was suggested to minimize the morbidity associated with conventional open stomal techniques. We describe and evaluate a technique of stoma creation done directly through the stoma site, avoiding both laparotomy and laparoscopy. METHODS: Charts of 36 patients who underwent attempted stoma creation using this closed technique were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: A total of 32 patients had stomas successfully created in this fashion (closed group); although four patients failed and required laparotomy (open group), there was an overall success rate of 89 percent. Blood loss (17 ± 5 vs. 350 ± 130 ml; P < .001), operative time (52 ± 8 vs. 169 ± 35 minutes; P < 0.001), and complications (3/32 vs. 4/4; P < 0.001) favored the closed group. No factor, including diagnosis, obesity, or previous abdominal surgery were identified that contraindicated use of the closed technique. CONCLUSIONS: Stomas can be safely made in a high proportion of patients without the need for laparotomy or laparoscopy. Failure of the closed technique identifies a group of patients who have a high associated operative time, blood loss, and morbidity when laparotomy is used for stoma creation and in whom laparoscopic procedures may improve results.
KW - Closed technique
KW - Complications
KW - Laparoscopy
KW - Stoma
KW - Surgical technique
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0342981652&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/BF02055693
DO - 10.1007/BF02055693
M3 - Article
C2 - 9102252
AN - SCOPUS:0342981652
SN - 0012-3706
VL - 40
SP - 112
EP - 115
JO - Diseases of the Colon and Rectum
JF - Diseases of the Colon and Rectum
IS - 1
ER -