TY - JOUR
T1 - Stereotactic MR-guided on-table adaptive radiation therapy (SMART) for borderline resectable and locally advanced pancreatic cancer
T2 - A multi-center, open-label phase 2 study
AU - Chuong, Michael D.
AU - Lee, Percy
AU - Low, Daniel A.
AU - Kim, Joshua
AU - Mittauer, Kathryn E.
AU - Bassetti, Michael F.
AU - Glide-Hurst, Carri K.
AU - Raldow, Ann C.
AU - Yang, Yingli
AU - Portelance, Lorraine
AU - Padgett, Kyle R.
AU - Zaki, Bassem
AU - Zhang, Rongxiao
AU - Kim, Hyun
AU - Henke, Lauren E.
AU - Price, Alex T.
AU - Mancias, Joseph D.
AU - Williams, Christopher L.
AU - Ng, John
AU - Pennell, Ryan
AU - Raphael Pfeffer, M.
AU - Levin, Daphne
AU - Mueller, Adam C.
AU - Mooney, Karen E.
AU - Kelly, Patrick
AU - Shah, Amish P.
AU - Boldrini, Luca
AU - Placidi, Lorenzo
AU - Fuss, Martin
AU - Jitendra Parikh, Parag
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Author(s)
PY - 2024/2
Y1 - 2024/2
N2 - Background and purpose: Radiation dose escalation may improve local control (LC) and overall survival (OS) in select pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patients. We prospectively evaluated the safety and efficacy of ablative stereotactic magnetic resonance (MR)-guided adaptive radiation therapy (SMART) for borderline resectable (BRPC) and locally advanced pancreas cancer (LAPC). The primary endpoint of acute grade ≥ 3 gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity definitely related to SMART was previously published with median follow-up (FU) 8.8 months from SMART. We now present more mature outcomes including OS and late toxicity. Materials and methods: This prospective, multi-center, single-arm open-label phase 2 trial (NCT03621644) enrolled 136 patients (LAPC 56.6 %; BRPC 43.4 %) after ≥ 3 months of any chemotherapy without distant progression and CA19-9 ≤ 500 U/mL. SMART was delivered on a 0.35 T MR-guided system prescribed to 50 Gy in 5 fractions (biologically effective dose10 [BED10] = 100 Gy). Elective coverage was optional. Surgery and chemotherapy were permitted after SMART. Results: Mean age was 65.7 years (range, 36–85), induction FOLFIRINOX was common (81.7 %), most received elective coverage (57.4 %), and 34.6 % had surgery after SMART. Median FU was 22.9 months from diagnosis and 14.2 months from SMART, respectively. 2-year OS from diagnosis and SMART were 53.6 % and 40.5 %, respectively. Late grade ≥ 3 toxicity definitely, probably, or possibly attributed to SMART were observed in 0 %, 4.6 %, and 11.5 % patients, respectively. Conclusions: Long-term outcomes from the phase 2 SMART trial demonstrate encouraging OS and limited severe toxicity. Additional prospective evaluation of this novel strategy is warranted.
AB - Background and purpose: Radiation dose escalation may improve local control (LC) and overall survival (OS) in select pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patients. We prospectively evaluated the safety and efficacy of ablative stereotactic magnetic resonance (MR)-guided adaptive radiation therapy (SMART) for borderline resectable (BRPC) and locally advanced pancreas cancer (LAPC). The primary endpoint of acute grade ≥ 3 gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity definitely related to SMART was previously published with median follow-up (FU) 8.8 months from SMART. We now present more mature outcomes including OS and late toxicity. Materials and methods: This prospective, multi-center, single-arm open-label phase 2 trial (NCT03621644) enrolled 136 patients (LAPC 56.6 %; BRPC 43.4 %) after ≥ 3 months of any chemotherapy without distant progression and CA19-9 ≤ 500 U/mL. SMART was delivered on a 0.35 T MR-guided system prescribed to 50 Gy in 5 fractions (biologically effective dose10 [BED10] = 100 Gy). Elective coverage was optional. Surgery and chemotherapy were permitted after SMART. Results: Mean age was 65.7 years (range, 36–85), induction FOLFIRINOX was common (81.7 %), most received elective coverage (57.4 %), and 34.6 % had surgery after SMART. Median FU was 22.9 months from diagnosis and 14.2 months from SMART, respectively. 2-year OS from diagnosis and SMART were 53.6 % and 40.5 %, respectively. Late grade ≥ 3 toxicity definitely, probably, or possibly attributed to SMART were observed in 0 %, 4.6 %, and 11.5 % patients, respectively. Conclusions: Long-term outcomes from the phase 2 SMART trial demonstrate encouraging OS and limited severe toxicity. Additional prospective evaluation of this novel strategy is warranted.
KW - Adenocarcinoma
KW - Induction chemotherapy
KW - Pancreatic neoplasms
KW - Radiotherapy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85181120868&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.radonc.2023.110064
DO - 10.1016/j.radonc.2023.110064
M3 - Article
C2 - 38135187
AN - SCOPUS:85181120868
SN - 0167-8140
VL - 191
JO - Radiotherapy and Oncology
JF - Radiotherapy and Oncology
M1 - 110064
ER -