TY - JOUR
T1 - Stenting in Intracranial Stenosis
T2 - Current Controversies and Future Directions
AU - Chatterjee, Arindam R.
AU - Derdeyn, Colin P.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015, Springer Science+Business Media New York.
PY - 2015/8/26
Y1 - 2015/8/26
N2 - Angioplasty and stenting for intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS) are a last resort for patients with high-grade intracranial stenosis with multiple ischemic events unresponsive to medical therapy. Medical management, consisting of aggressive risk factor control and dual antiplatelet therapy, is superior to angioplasty and stenting for the prevention of future stroke. Future studies of angioplasty and stenting in this population are important, as the stroke risk on medical therapy is 12 % at 1 year and post-procedure stroke rates are similar to rates with medical treatment. There are many issues that will need to be resolved for stenting to offer any benefit, however. Procedural risks of hemorrhagic and ischemic stroke are unacceptably high. High-risk subgroups, potentially based on hemodynamic factors, will need to be identified for future interventional trials. Nevertheless, it is still reasonable to consider angioplasty and stenting for selected patients with multiple recurrent events despite aggressive medical management, but benefits are unclear at this time.
AB - Angioplasty and stenting for intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS) are a last resort for patients with high-grade intracranial stenosis with multiple ischemic events unresponsive to medical therapy. Medical management, consisting of aggressive risk factor control and dual antiplatelet therapy, is superior to angioplasty and stenting for the prevention of future stroke. Future studies of angioplasty and stenting in this population are important, as the stroke risk on medical therapy is 12 % at 1 year and post-procedure stroke rates are similar to rates with medical treatment. There are many issues that will need to be resolved for stenting to offer any benefit, however. Procedural risks of hemorrhagic and ischemic stroke are unacceptably high. High-risk subgroups, potentially based on hemodynamic factors, will need to be identified for future interventional trials. Nevertheless, it is still reasonable to consider angioplasty and stenting for selected patients with multiple recurrent events despite aggressive medical management, but benefits are unclear at this time.
KW - Angioplasty
KW - Cerebral atherosclerosis
KW - Endovascular
KW - Humans
KW - Intracranial atherosclerotic disease
KW - Ischemic stroke
KW - Stenosis
KW - Stenting
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84932603842&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s11883-015-0527-4
DO - 10.1007/s11883-015-0527-4
M3 - Review article
C2 - 26104430
AN - SCOPUS:84932603842
SN - 1523-3804
VL - 17
JO - Current atherosclerosis reports
JF - Current atherosclerosis reports
IS - 8
M1 - 48
ER -