TY - JOUR
T1 - Status of LGBTQ+ Inclusion Using a Multi-Institution Assessment of US Radiology Residencies
AU - Perchik, Jordan D.
AU - Maxfield, Charles M.
AU - Mills, Megan
AU - Agarwal, Atul
AU - Hull, Nate C.
AU - Darrow, Anne
AU - Wang, Morlie
AU - Cooke, Erin
AU - Seekins, Jayne
AU - Marx, Mary
AU - Wassef, Heidi
AU - Gould, Jennifer
AU - Grimm, Lars J.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 American College of Radiology
PY - 2025/1
Y1 - 2025/1
N2 - Introduction: An inclusive residency program is crucial to the recruitment and retention of competitive and diverse applicants. The radiology lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer or questioning, or another diverse gender identity (LGBTQ+) inclusion audit was published in 2022, which provided a road map for assessing the inclusivity of a program's policies, facilities, culture, and engagement. In this multi-institutional trial, we detail the results of the LGBTQ+ inclusion audit for nine US radiology residency programs. Methods: A volunteer cohort of academic radiology programs was recruited through the Radiology Residency Education Research Alliance. The LGBTQ+ inclusion audit was modified to apply to a multi-institutional study. Participating programs performed the audit from December 2023 to February 2024. Pre- and postaudit surveys were distributed to capture participants subjective assessment of inclusivity at their programs. Results: Nine US radiology residency programs completed the audit. Audit scores ranged from 6 out of 10 to 9 out of 10; no program received a perfect 10 out of 10 score. Inclusive facilities and institutional culture scored highly, with eight of nine programs reporting all milestones met in these areas. The lowest-performing areas were department culture and community engagement with only three of nine and four of nine programs reporting “all milestones met.” After the audit, programs overall reported improved self-perceived inclusivity, with postaudit survey scores increasing in areas related to department policy, inclusive facilities, and LGBTQ+ community outreach. Discussion: Participating radiology residency programs demonstrated an overall high level of LGBTQ+ inclusivity; however, all programs identified inclusion shortcomings in department policy and practice. Intentional review of a department can be a helpful tool to promote a welcoming and healthy environment for a diverse radiology practice.
AB - Introduction: An inclusive residency program is crucial to the recruitment and retention of competitive and diverse applicants. The radiology lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer or questioning, or another diverse gender identity (LGBTQ+) inclusion audit was published in 2022, which provided a road map for assessing the inclusivity of a program's policies, facilities, culture, and engagement. In this multi-institutional trial, we detail the results of the LGBTQ+ inclusion audit for nine US radiology residency programs. Methods: A volunteer cohort of academic radiology programs was recruited through the Radiology Residency Education Research Alliance. The LGBTQ+ inclusion audit was modified to apply to a multi-institutional study. Participating programs performed the audit from December 2023 to February 2024. Pre- and postaudit surveys were distributed to capture participants subjective assessment of inclusivity at their programs. Results: Nine US radiology residency programs completed the audit. Audit scores ranged from 6 out of 10 to 9 out of 10; no program received a perfect 10 out of 10 score. Inclusive facilities and institutional culture scored highly, with eight of nine programs reporting all milestones met in these areas. The lowest-performing areas were department culture and community engagement with only three of nine and four of nine programs reporting “all milestones met.” After the audit, programs overall reported improved self-perceived inclusivity, with postaudit survey scores increasing in areas related to department policy, inclusive facilities, and LGBTQ+ community outreach. Discussion: Participating radiology residency programs demonstrated an overall high level of LGBTQ+ inclusivity; however, all programs identified inclusion shortcomings in department policy and practice. Intentional review of a department can be a helpful tool to promote a welcoming and healthy environment for a diverse radiology practice.
KW - Diversity
KW - LGBTQ+
KW - Microaggression
KW - equity
KW - inclusion
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85205924375&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jacr.2024.08.008
DO - 10.1016/j.jacr.2024.08.008
M3 - Article
C2 - 39216783
AN - SCOPUS:85205924375
SN - 1546-1440
VL - 22
SP - 108
EP - 115
JO - Journal of the American College of Radiology
JF - Journal of the American College of Radiology
IS - 1
ER -