TY - JOUR
T1 - Staging of neuroblastoma at imaging
T2 - Report of the radiology diagnostic oncology group
AU - Siegel, Marilyn J.
AU - Ishwaran, Hemant
AU - Fletcher, Barry D.
AU - Meyer, James S.
AU - Hoffer, Fredric A.
AU - Jaramillo, Diego
AU - Hernandez, Ramiro J.
AU - Roubal, Susan E.
AU - Siegel, Barry A.
AU - Caudry, Daryl J.
AU - McNeil, Barbara J.
PY - 2002
Y1 - 2002
N2 - PURPOSE: To compare the accuracies of computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, and bone scintigraphy in staging disease in patients with neuroblastoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ninety-six children with newly diagnosed neuroblastoma were enrolled in a multicenter prospective cohort study. CT, MR, and bone scintigraphy were used to evaluate tumor stage. Sensitivity and specificity values and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were used to compare the accuracy of CT, MR, and scintigraphy for tumor staging. RESULTS: Eighty-eight patients were eligible for staging analysis, and 45 patients who underwent surgery at initial diagnosis were eligible for analysis of local tumor extent. CT and MR had sensitivities of 43% and 83%, respectively (P < .01), and specificities of 97% and 88%, respectively (P > .05), for detection of stage 4 disease. Areas under the ROC curves for CT and MR were 0.81 and 0.85, respectively (P = .06); that for scintigraphy was 0.83. Addition of scintigraphy to both CT and MR increased the areas under the ROC curves to 0.90 and 0.88, respectively. Accuracy of CT and MR for staging disease confined to the chest or abdomen (stages 1, 2, and 3) was poor. CONCLUSION: MR alone and CT and MR combined with bone scintigraphy enable the accurate detection of stage 4 disease. Both CT and MR perform poorly for local tumor staging.
AB - PURPOSE: To compare the accuracies of computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, and bone scintigraphy in staging disease in patients with neuroblastoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ninety-six children with newly diagnosed neuroblastoma were enrolled in a multicenter prospective cohort study. CT, MR, and bone scintigraphy were used to evaluate tumor stage. Sensitivity and specificity values and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were used to compare the accuracy of CT, MR, and scintigraphy for tumor staging. RESULTS: Eighty-eight patients were eligible for staging analysis, and 45 patients who underwent surgery at initial diagnosis were eligible for analysis of local tumor extent. CT and MR had sensitivities of 43% and 83%, respectively (P < .01), and specificities of 97% and 88%, respectively (P > .05), for detection of stage 4 disease. Areas under the ROC curves for CT and MR were 0.81 and 0.85, respectively (P = .06); that for scintigraphy was 0.83. Addition of scintigraphy to both CT and MR increased the areas under the ROC curves to 0.90 and 0.88, respectively. Accuracy of CT and MR for staging disease confined to the chest or abdomen (stages 1, 2, and 3) was poor. CONCLUSION: MR alone and CT and MR combined with bone scintigraphy enable the accurate detection of stage 4 disease. Both CT and MR perform poorly for local tumor staging.
KW - Computed tomography (CT), comparative studies
KW - Magnetic resonance (MR), comparative studies
KW - Neoplasms, staging
KW - Neuroblastoma
KW - Radionuclides, comparative studies
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036202319&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1148/radiol.2231010841
DO - 10.1148/radiol.2231010841
M3 - Article
C2 - 11930063
AN - SCOPUS:0036202319
SN - 0033-8419
VL - 223
SP - 168
EP - 175
JO - Radiology
JF - Radiology
IS - 1
ER -