TY - JOUR
T1 - SPINK1 Defines a Molecular Subtype of Prostate Cancer in Men with More Rapid Progression in an at Risk, Natural History Radical Prostatectomy Cohort
AU - Johnson, Michael H.
AU - Ross, Ashley E.
AU - Alshalalfa, Mohammed
AU - Erho, Nicholas
AU - Yousefi, Kasra
AU - Glavaris, Stephanie
AU - Fedor, Helen
AU - Han, Misop
AU - Faraj, Sheila F.
AU - Bezerra, Stephania M.
AU - Netto, George
AU - Partin, Alan W.
AU - Trock, Bruce J.
AU - Davicioni, Elai
AU - Schaeffer, Edward M.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.
PY - 2016/11/1
Y1 - 2016/11/1
N2 - Purpose Prostate cancer is clinically and molecularly heterogeneous. We determined the prognosis of men with ERG-ETS fusions and SPINK1 over expression. Materials and Methods Men were identified with intermediate or high risk localized prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy and no therapy before metastasis. A case-cohort design sampled a cohort (262) enriched with metastasis from the entire cohort and a cohort (213) enriched with metastasis from patients with biochemical recurrence. We analyzed transcriptomic profiles and subtyped tumors as m-ERG+, m-ETS+, m-SPINK1+ or Triple Negative (m-ERG─/m-ETS─/m-SPINK1─), and multivariable logistic regression analyses, Kaplan-Meier and multivariable Cox models were used to evaluate subtypes as predictors of clinical outcomes. Results Overall 36%, 13%, 11% and 40% of prostate cancer was classified as m-ERG+, m-ETS+, m-SPINK1+ and Triple Negative, respectively. Univariable analysis demonstrated that m-SPINK1+ tumors were more common in African-American men (OR 5, 95% CI 1.6–16) but less commonly associated with positive surgical margins (OR 0.16, 95% CI 0.03–0.69) compared to the m-ERG+ group. Compared to the Triple Negative group, m-SPINK1+ showed similar associations with race and surgical margins in univariable and multivariable analyses across the entire cohort. Survival analyses did not show significant differences among m-ERG+, m-ETS+ and Triple Negative cases. m-SPINK1+ independently predicted prostate cancer specific mortality after metastasis (HR 2.48, 95% CI 0.96–6.4) and biochemical recurrence (HR 3, 95% CI 1.1–8). Conclusions SPINK1 over expression is associated with prostate cancer specific mortality in at risk men with biochemical and clinical recurrence after prostatectomy. ERG-ETS alterations are not prognostic for outcome.
AB - Purpose Prostate cancer is clinically and molecularly heterogeneous. We determined the prognosis of men with ERG-ETS fusions and SPINK1 over expression. Materials and Methods Men were identified with intermediate or high risk localized prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy and no therapy before metastasis. A case-cohort design sampled a cohort (262) enriched with metastasis from the entire cohort and a cohort (213) enriched with metastasis from patients with biochemical recurrence. We analyzed transcriptomic profiles and subtyped tumors as m-ERG+, m-ETS+, m-SPINK1+ or Triple Negative (m-ERG─/m-ETS─/m-SPINK1─), and multivariable logistic regression analyses, Kaplan-Meier and multivariable Cox models were used to evaluate subtypes as predictors of clinical outcomes. Results Overall 36%, 13%, 11% and 40% of prostate cancer was classified as m-ERG+, m-ETS+, m-SPINK1+ and Triple Negative, respectively. Univariable analysis demonstrated that m-SPINK1+ tumors were more common in African-American men (OR 5, 95% CI 1.6–16) but less commonly associated with positive surgical margins (OR 0.16, 95% CI 0.03–0.69) compared to the m-ERG+ group. Compared to the Triple Negative group, m-SPINK1+ showed similar associations with race and surgical margins in univariable and multivariable analyses across the entire cohort. Survival analyses did not show significant differences among m-ERG+, m-ETS+ and Triple Negative cases. m-SPINK1+ independently predicted prostate cancer specific mortality after metastasis (HR 2.48, 95% CI 0.96–6.4) and biochemical recurrence (HR 3, 95% CI 1.1–8). Conclusions SPINK1 over expression is associated with prostate cancer specific mortality in at risk men with biochemical and clinical recurrence after prostatectomy. ERG-ETS alterations are not prognostic for outcome.
KW - genomics
KW - neoplasm metastasis
KW - prognosis
KW - prostatic neoplasms
KW - transcriptome
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84992348938&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.juro.2016.05.092
DO - 10.1016/j.juro.2016.05.092
M3 - Article
C2 - 27238617
AN - SCOPUS:84992348938
SN - 0022-5347
VL - 196
SP - 1436
EP - 1444
JO - Journal of Urology
JF - Journal of Urology
IS - 5
ER -