TY - JOUR
T1 - Speaking out about physical harms from tobacco use
T2 - Response to graphic warning labels among American Indian/Alaska Native communities
AU - Wolf, David A.Patterson Silver
AU - Tovar, Molly
AU - Thompson, Kellie
AU - Ishcomer, Jamie
AU - Kreuter, Matthew W.
AU - Caburnay, Charlene
AU - Boyum, Sonia
PY - 2016
Y1 - 2016
N2 - Objective: This study is the first to explore the impact of graphic cigarette labels with physical harm images on members of American Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN) communities. The aim of this article is to investigate how AI/AN respond to particular graphic warning labels. Methods: The parent study recruited smokers, at-risk smokers and non-smokers from three different age groups (youths aged 13-17 years, young adults aged 18-24 years and adults aged 25+ years) and five population subgroups with high smoking prevalence or smoking risk. Using nine graphic labels, this study collected participant data in the field via an iPadadministered survey and card sorting of graphic warning labels. This paper reports on findings for AI/AN participants. Results: After viewing graphic warning labels, participants rated their likelihood of talking about smoking risks to friends, parents and siblings higher than their likelihood of talking to teachers and doctors. Further, this study found that certain labels (eg, the label of the toddler in the smoke cloud) made them think about their friends and family who smoke. Conclusions: Given the influence of community social networks on health beliefs and attitudes, health communication using graphic warning labels could effect change in the smoking habits of AI/AN community members. Study findings suggest that graphic labels could serve as stimuli for conversations about the risks of smoking among AI/AN community members, and could be an important element of a peer-to-peer smoking cessation effort.
AB - Objective: This study is the first to explore the impact of graphic cigarette labels with physical harm images on members of American Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN) communities. The aim of this article is to investigate how AI/AN respond to particular graphic warning labels. Methods: The parent study recruited smokers, at-risk smokers and non-smokers from three different age groups (youths aged 13-17 years, young adults aged 18-24 years and adults aged 25+ years) and five population subgroups with high smoking prevalence or smoking risk. Using nine graphic labels, this study collected participant data in the field via an iPadadministered survey and card sorting of graphic warning labels. This paper reports on findings for AI/AN participants. Results: After viewing graphic warning labels, participants rated their likelihood of talking about smoking risks to friends, parents and siblings higher than their likelihood of talking to teachers and doctors. Further, this study found that certain labels (eg, the label of the toddler in the smoke cloud) made them think about their friends and family who smoke. Conclusions: Given the influence of community social networks on health beliefs and attitudes, health communication using graphic warning labels could effect change in the smoking habits of AI/AN community members. Study findings suggest that graphic labels could serve as stimuli for conversations about the risks of smoking among AI/AN community members, and could be an important element of a peer-to-peer smoking cessation effort.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84962278082
U2 - 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008777
DO - 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008777
M3 - Article
C2 - 27009143
AN - SCOPUS:84962278082
SN - 2044-6055
VL - 6
JO - BMJ Open
JF - BMJ Open
IS - 3
M1 - e008777
ER -