TY - JOUR
T1 - Sonography of the rotator cuff
T2 - Analysis of interobserver variability
AU - Middleton, William D.
AU - Teefey, Sharlene A.
AU - Yamaguchi, Ken
PY - 2004/11
Y1 - 2004/11
N2 - OBJECTIVE. The purpose of our study was to determine the interobserver variability in the sonographic evaluation of the rotator cuff. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Two radiologists independently scanned 61 patients with shoulder pain. Each radiologist categorized the rotator cuff as normal, partially torn, or fully torn. When a tear was present, the tendons involved were specified. All diagnoses were made prospectively without knowledge of the findings of the other radiologist. RESULTS. The radiologists were in full agreement in the categorization of 92% (56/61) of the patients. In four of the five discrepant cases, the disagreement was whether there was a full-thickness or a partial-thickness tear. The radiologists were in agreement concerning which tendons were involved in 80% (41/51) of the patients in whom a tear was detected by both observers. In all 10 discrepant cases, the disagreement was whether a tear involved both the supraspinatus and infraspinatus tendons or was isolated to one or the other of these tendons. CONCLUSION. The level of interobserver variability in the sonographic detection and characterization of rotator cuff tears is low.
AB - OBJECTIVE. The purpose of our study was to determine the interobserver variability in the sonographic evaluation of the rotator cuff. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Two radiologists independently scanned 61 patients with shoulder pain. Each radiologist categorized the rotator cuff as normal, partially torn, or fully torn. When a tear was present, the tendons involved were specified. All diagnoses were made prospectively without knowledge of the findings of the other radiologist. RESULTS. The radiologists were in full agreement in the categorization of 92% (56/61) of the patients. In four of the five discrepant cases, the disagreement was whether there was a full-thickness or a partial-thickness tear. The radiologists were in agreement concerning which tendons were involved in 80% (41/51) of the patients in whom a tear was detected by both observers. In all 10 discrepant cases, the disagreement was whether a tear involved both the supraspinatus and infraspinatus tendons or was isolated to one or the other of these tendons. CONCLUSION. The level of interobserver variability in the sonographic detection and characterization of rotator cuff tears is low.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=16544367032&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2214/ajr.183.5.1831465
DO - 10.2214/ajr.183.5.1831465
M3 - Article
C2 - 15505321
AN - SCOPUS:16544367032
SN - 0361-803X
VL - 183
SP - 1465
EP - 1468
JO - American Journal of Roentgenology
JF - American Journal of Roentgenology
IS - 5
ER -