TY - JOUR
T1 - Social Support Fully Mediates the Association Between Communication Abilities and Social Participation Among Persons with Post-Stroke Aphasia
AU - Lee, Yejin
AU - Fritz, Katrina
AU - Dagli, Chaitali
AU - Nicholas, Marjorie L.
AU - Connor, Lisa Tabor
N1 - Funding Information:
Funds for participant remuneration were provided by the MGH Institute of Health Professions and the Program in Occupational Therapy at Washington University School of Medicine to LC and MN. We would like to thank participants in the project for their contributions and Washington University School of Medicine and MGH Institute of Health Professions for technical support and facilities.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - Background: Communication abilities have been considered to be a key influential factor for social participation in persons with post-stroke aphasia. Previous literature has shown that social support is positively associated with social participation post-stroke. However, few studies have investigated if social support mediates the negative impact of communication difficulties on social participation in persons with aphasia and without aphasia after stroke. Aims: To investigate the mediation effect of social support on the association between communication abilities and social participation in persons with aphasia and without aphasia after stroke. Methods & Procedures: A total of 116 participants who have had a stroke, including 60 persons with aphasia and 56 persons without aphasia, were enrolled. This study used a regression-based mediation analysis using Hayes’s PROCESS macro (SPSS model 4). Measures included the Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) - Social Support Survey as the mediator (perceived social support), the Stroke Impact Scale 2.0 (SIS) communication domain as the independent variable, and the Activity Card Sort (ACS) social activity domain as the dependent variable (social participation). Two separate models were built for persons with aphasia and without aphasia. As post hoc analyses, the four domains of MOS social support (emotional/informational support, affectional support, positive social interaction, and tangible support) were included as a mediator in four individual models. Outcomes & Results: Our results showed that there was no difference in social participation between persons with aphasia and without aphasia after stroke. Perceived social support (b=0.180, 95% CI=0.054~0.352), including emotional/informational support (b=0.182, 95% CI=0.552~0.359), affectionate support (b=0.138, 95% CI=0.020~0.316), and positive social interaction (b=0.178, 95% CI=0.035~0.357), fully mediates the association between communication abilities and social participation in persons with aphasia, but did not for persons without aphasia (p>0.05). Conclusions: The results indicate that perceived social support, specifically emotional/informational support, affectionate support, and positive social interaction, may be used as an intervention approach for improving social participation in persons with post-stroke aphasia.
AB - Background: Communication abilities have been considered to be a key influential factor for social participation in persons with post-stroke aphasia. Previous literature has shown that social support is positively associated with social participation post-stroke. However, few studies have investigated if social support mediates the negative impact of communication difficulties on social participation in persons with aphasia and without aphasia after stroke. Aims: To investigate the mediation effect of social support on the association between communication abilities and social participation in persons with aphasia and without aphasia after stroke. Methods & Procedures: A total of 116 participants who have had a stroke, including 60 persons with aphasia and 56 persons without aphasia, were enrolled. This study used a regression-based mediation analysis using Hayes’s PROCESS macro (SPSS model 4). Measures included the Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) - Social Support Survey as the mediator (perceived social support), the Stroke Impact Scale 2.0 (SIS) communication domain as the independent variable, and the Activity Card Sort (ACS) social activity domain as the dependent variable (social participation). Two separate models were built for persons with aphasia and without aphasia. As post hoc analyses, the four domains of MOS social support (emotional/informational support, affectional support, positive social interaction, and tangible support) were included as a mediator in four individual models. Outcomes & Results: Our results showed that there was no difference in social participation between persons with aphasia and without aphasia after stroke. Perceived social support (b=0.180, 95% CI=0.054~0.352), including emotional/informational support (b=0.182, 95% CI=0.552~0.359), affectionate support (b=0.138, 95% CI=0.020~0.316), and positive social interaction (b=0.178, 95% CI=0.035~0.357), fully mediates the association between communication abilities and social participation in persons with aphasia, but did not for persons without aphasia (p>0.05). Conclusions: The results indicate that perceived social support, specifically emotional/informational support, affectionate support, and positive social interaction, may be used as an intervention approach for improving social participation in persons with post-stroke aphasia.
KW - Aphasia
KW - Communication
KW - Mediation
KW - Social Participation
KW - Social Support
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85132666233&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/02687038.2022.2063792
DO - 10.1080/02687038.2022.2063792
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85132666233
SN - 0268-7038
VL - 37
SP - 980
EP - 992
JO - Aphasiology
JF - Aphasiology
IS - 7
ER -