Social inequality and assortative mating: Cause or consequence?

A. C. Heath, L. J. Eaves, W. E. Nance, L. A. Corey

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

21 Scopus citations

Abstract

Johnson et al. (Behav. Genet.17:1-7, 1987) have interpreted an apparent decline in assortative mating for educational attainment in Hawaii as being a consequence of increased social mobility and increased access to higher education. Data on the educational attainments of adult twin pairs and their spouses from the Virginia twin registry are reported which give no indication of a major decline in the intensity of assortative mating. A previous study of a Norwegian population (Heath et al., Behav. Genet.15:349-369, 1985), in which an increase in equality of educational opportunity had been documented (Heath et al., Nature314:734-736, 1985), observed remarkable constancy of the marital correlation for educational attainment. There is thus little evidence that decreases in social inequality in a society lead to a decline in assortative mating.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)9-17
Number of pages9
JournalBehavior genetics
Volume17
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1987
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Social inequality
  • assortative mating
  • temporal trends

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Social inequality and assortative mating: Cause or consequence?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this