TY - JOUR
T1 - Skin testing to detect penicillin allergy
AU - Sullivan, Timothy J.
AU - Wedner, H. James
AU - Shatz, Gerald S.
AU - Yecies, Lewis D.
AU - Parker, Charles W.
N1 - Funding Information:
F:vm the Department of internal Medicine, University Health Science Center at Dallas, the Howard Hughes Institute Laboratory and Department of Internal Medicine, mgton University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO., Department of Internal Medicine, SUNY-Stony Brook. Brook, N.Y. >,‘Lpported m part by NIH grant KO7-A100414. Received for publication Feb. 23, 198 I h<::cepted for publication June 10, 1981. Reprint requests to: Timothy J. Sullivan, Allergy Section, ment of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Health (‘enter. 5323 Harry Hines Blvd., Dallas, TX 75235.
PY - 1981/9
Y1 - 1981/9
N2 - Skin testing for penicillin allergy with penicillin G (Pen G), penicilloic acid (PA), and penicilloyl poly-l-lysine (PPL) was performed on 740 subjects, and the results were assessed from epidemiologic and immunologic perspectives. Approximately 95% of these patients had histories of apparent allergic reactions to β-lactam antibiotics, and 63% were skin-test positive. The prevalence of positive skin tests was related to the time that had elapsed between clinical reactions and skin testing. Ninety-three percent were skin-test positive 7 to 12 mo after reactions, and 22% were positive 10 yr or more after reactions. Patients under 30 yr of age had a prevalence of positive skin tests 1.7-fold higher than older patients. Testing with PPL, PA, and Pen G detected 76.3%, 55.3%, and 57.1% of the positive patients, respectively. Omission of PPL, PA, or Pen G would have led to a failure to detect 25.6%, 7.2%, and 6.2% of the positive patients, respectively. Subjects with skin tests positive to penicillin often reacted to skin tests with other β-lactam antibiotics; 73% (41 of 56) reacted to ampicillin and 51% (38 of 74) reacted to cephalothin. No serious allergic reactions were provoked by testing. None of the 83 skin test-negative patients treated with β-lactam antibiotics immediately after testing experienced acute allergic reactions. Two patients developed mild urticaria beginning 3 and 5 days into therapy. One skin test-negative patient experienced urticaria 3 hr after receiving oral penicillin 6 mo after skin testing. This patient's skin-test status immediately before therapy was unknown. These results support the position that testing with PPL. PA, and Pen G is a rapid safe, and effective method for identifying patients at risk, or not at risk, for allergic reaction to penicillin.
AB - Skin testing for penicillin allergy with penicillin G (Pen G), penicilloic acid (PA), and penicilloyl poly-l-lysine (PPL) was performed on 740 subjects, and the results were assessed from epidemiologic and immunologic perspectives. Approximately 95% of these patients had histories of apparent allergic reactions to β-lactam antibiotics, and 63% were skin-test positive. The prevalence of positive skin tests was related to the time that had elapsed between clinical reactions and skin testing. Ninety-three percent were skin-test positive 7 to 12 mo after reactions, and 22% were positive 10 yr or more after reactions. Patients under 30 yr of age had a prevalence of positive skin tests 1.7-fold higher than older patients. Testing with PPL, PA, and Pen G detected 76.3%, 55.3%, and 57.1% of the positive patients, respectively. Omission of PPL, PA, or Pen G would have led to a failure to detect 25.6%, 7.2%, and 6.2% of the positive patients, respectively. Subjects with skin tests positive to penicillin often reacted to skin tests with other β-lactam antibiotics; 73% (41 of 56) reacted to ampicillin and 51% (38 of 74) reacted to cephalothin. No serious allergic reactions were provoked by testing. None of the 83 skin test-negative patients treated with β-lactam antibiotics immediately after testing experienced acute allergic reactions. Two patients developed mild urticaria beginning 3 and 5 days into therapy. One skin test-negative patient experienced urticaria 3 hr after receiving oral penicillin 6 mo after skin testing. This patient's skin-test status immediately before therapy was unknown. These results support the position that testing with PPL. PA, and Pen G is a rapid safe, and effective method for identifying patients at risk, or not at risk, for allergic reaction to penicillin.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0019501276&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/0091-6749(81)90180-9
DO - 10.1016/0091-6749(81)90180-9
M3 - Article
C2 - 6267115
AN - SCOPUS:0019501276
SN - 0091-6749
VL - 68
SP - 171
EP - 180
JO - The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
JF - The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
IS - 3
ER -