Signaling among neighboring plants and the development of size inequalities in plant populations

  • Carlos L. Ballaré
  • , Ana L. Scopel
  • , Emily T. Jordan
  • , Richard D. Vierstra

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

91 Scopus citations

Abstract

Transgenic tobacco plants that express an oat phytochrome gene (phyA) under control of the cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV) 35S promoter and display altered photophysiology were used to test the role of light as a vehicle of information in dominance relationships between neighboring plants. Compared with the isogenic wild type, phyA-overexpressing plants showed dramatically reduced morphological responsivity to changes in the red/far red ratio of the incident light and to the proximity of neighboring plants in spacing experiments. In transgenic canopies an increase in stand density caused the small plants of the population to be rapidly suppressed by their neighbors. In wild-type canopies, plants responded to increased density with large morphological changes, and there appeared to be an inverse relationship between the magnitude of this morphological response and the ranking of the individual plant in the population size hierarchy. In these wild-type populations, size inequality increased only moderately with density within the time frame of the experiments. Our results suggest that, in crowded stands, the ability of individual plants to acquire information about their light environment via phytochrome plays a central role in driving architectural changes that, at the population level, delay the development of size differences between neighbors.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)10094-10098
Number of pages5
JournalProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
Volume91
Issue number21
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 11 1994

Keywords

  • phytochrome
  • plant canopies
  • plant competition
  • sensory ecology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Signaling among neighboring plants and the development of size inequalities in plant populations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this