TY - JOUR
T1 - Selection of the optimal distal fusion level in posterior instrumentation and fusion for thoracic hyperkyphosis
T2 - The sagittal stable vertebra concept
AU - Cho, Kyu Jung
AU - Lenke, Lawrence G.
AU - Bridwell, Keith H.
AU - Kamiya, Mitsuhiro
AU - Sides, Brenda
PY - 2009/4/15
Y1 - 2009/4/15
N2 - STUDY DESIGN.: Retrospective study. OBJECTIVE.: To determine the appropriate distal fusion level in posterior instrumentation and fusion for thoracic hyperkyphosis by investigating the relationship between the sagittal stable vertebra ([SSV]-the most proximal lumbar vertebral body touched by the vertical line from the posterior-superior corner of the sacrum), first lordotic vertebra (just caudal to the first lordotic disc), and selected lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA.: It has been recommended that the distal end vertebra and the first lordotic disc beyond the transitional zone distally be included in distal fusion for thoracic hyperkyphosis; however, we have seen distal junctional breakdown even when these rules have been followed. METHODS.: Thirty-one patients (mean age: 18 years, range: 13-38) who underwent long posterior instrumentation and fusion for thoracic hyperkyphosis with a minimum 2-year follow-up were reviewed. Preoperative diagnoses included Scheuermann kyphosis (n = 29), post-traumatic kyphosis (n = 1), and postlaminectomy kyphosis (n = 1). According to the distal fusion level, patients were divided into 2 groups. Group I (n = 24): LIV included the SSV; group II (n = 7): the LIV was proximal to the SSV. Patients were evaluated using standing radiographs and chart review. RESULTS.: Preoperative mean thoracic kyphosis was 86.6 ± 8.5° and 53.0 ± 10.4° at final follow-up with a correction rate of 39%. Preoperative average sagittal balance was slightly negative (-0.24 ± 3.8 cm), and became slightly more negative (-1.33 ± 2.8 cm) by final follow-up. There were no statistical differences in thoracic kyphosis between the 2 groups. However, there was a statistically significant difference with group II having a more posterior translation of the center of the LIV from the posterior sacral vertical line before surgery and at final follow-up (P = 0.003). In group I, distal junctional problems developed in 2 of 24 (8%) patients and in group II, problems occurred in 5 of 7 (71%) patients (P < 0.05). Despite extending the fusion to the first lordotic vertebra, distal junctional problems developed in 3 of 8 (38%) patients. CONCLUSION.: The distal end of a fusion for thoracic hyperkyphosis should include the SSV. Levels that include the first lordotic vertebra but not the SSV are not always appropriate to prevent postoperative distal junctional kyphosis.
AB - STUDY DESIGN.: Retrospective study. OBJECTIVE.: To determine the appropriate distal fusion level in posterior instrumentation and fusion for thoracic hyperkyphosis by investigating the relationship between the sagittal stable vertebra ([SSV]-the most proximal lumbar vertebral body touched by the vertical line from the posterior-superior corner of the sacrum), first lordotic vertebra (just caudal to the first lordotic disc), and selected lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA.: It has been recommended that the distal end vertebra and the first lordotic disc beyond the transitional zone distally be included in distal fusion for thoracic hyperkyphosis; however, we have seen distal junctional breakdown even when these rules have been followed. METHODS.: Thirty-one patients (mean age: 18 years, range: 13-38) who underwent long posterior instrumentation and fusion for thoracic hyperkyphosis with a minimum 2-year follow-up were reviewed. Preoperative diagnoses included Scheuermann kyphosis (n = 29), post-traumatic kyphosis (n = 1), and postlaminectomy kyphosis (n = 1). According to the distal fusion level, patients were divided into 2 groups. Group I (n = 24): LIV included the SSV; group II (n = 7): the LIV was proximal to the SSV. Patients were evaluated using standing radiographs and chart review. RESULTS.: Preoperative mean thoracic kyphosis was 86.6 ± 8.5° and 53.0 ± 10.4° at final follow-up with a correction rate of 39%. Preoperative average sagittal balance was slightly negative (-0.24 ± 3.8 cm), and became slightly more negative (-1.33 ± 2.8 cm) by final follow-up. There were no statistical differences in thoracic kyphosis between the 2 groups. However, there was a statistically significant difference with group II having a more posterior translation of the center of the LIV from the posterior sacral vertical line before surgery and at final follow-up (P = 0.003). In group I, distal junctional problems developed in 2 of 24 (8%) patients and in group II, problems occurred in 5 of 7 (71%) patients (P < 0.05). Despite extending the fusion to the first lordotic vertebra, distal junctional problems developed in 3 of 8 (38%) patients. CONCLUSION.: The distal end of a fusion for thoracic hyperkyphosis should include the SSV. Levels that include the first lordotic vertebra but not the SSV are not always appropriate to prevent postoperative distal junctional kyphosis.
KW - Distal fusion level
KW - Sagittal stable vertebra
KW - Thoracic hyperkyphosis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=67650334403&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31819e28ed
DO - 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31819e28ed
M3 - Article
C2 - 19365243
AN - SCOPUS:67650334403
SN - 0362-2436
VL - 34
SP - 765
EP - 770
JO - Spine
JF - Spine
IS - 8
ER -