TY - JOUR
T1 - Secondary acute lymphoblastic leukemia, a retrospective analysis from Washington University and meta-analysis of published data
AU - Ferraro, Francesca
AU - Gao, Feng
AU - Stockerl-Goldstein, Keith
AU - Westervelt, Peter
AU - DiPersio, John F.
AU - Ghobadi, Armin
N1 - Funding Information:
A.G. is supported by NIH UL1TR002345. FF is supported by the K12 Career Development award 5K12CA167540-07 (MPI)
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2018/9
Y1 - 2018/9
N2 - Secondary acute lymphoblastic leukemia (s-ALL) is rare and poorly defined and data regarding outcomes post-transplant are lacking. Here, we report a detailed analysis of s-ALL at our Institution. Among 211 eligible patients with ALL from 2006 to 2017, 30 (14%) were defined as s-ALL and the remaining as primary ALL (p-ALL). s-ALL patients were older and had higher incidence of adverse risk factors. Overall response (OR) after induction was not different between s-ALL and p-ALL (79% versus 90% respectively, p = 0.106). S-ALL group had a higher risk of relapse (RFS) and death (RFS HR = 1.93, 95% CI 1.2–3.12, p = 0.007. OS HR: =1.95, 95% CI 1.18–3.23, p = 0.01). In multivariate analysis, the adverse effect of s-ALL on RFS and OS was no longer significant, however a pooled meta-analysis of our and published data indicated that s-ALL is an independent risk factor for lower OS (HR: 1.30, 95% CI: 1.11–1.52, p < 0.01). Myeloablative allogeneic transplantation in s-ALL was associated with lower rates of relapse and higher transplant related mortality without improvement in OS. These data indicate that s-ALL status should be considered for risk- stratification of newly diagnosed ALL. The optimal conditioning regimen for s-ALL patients undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplantation needs to be evaluated in a larger study.
AB - Secondary acute lymphoblastic leukemia (s-ALL) is rare and poorly defined and data regarding outcomes post-transplant are lacking. Here, we report a detailed analysis of s-ALL at our Institution. Among 211 eligible patients with ALL from 2006 to 2017, 30 (14%) were defined as s-ALL and the remaining as primary ALL (p-ALL). s-ALL patients were older and had higher incidence of adverse risk factors. Overall response (OR) after induction was not different between s-ALL and p-ALL (79% versus 90% respectively, p = 0.106). S-ALL group had a higher risk of relapse (RFS) and death (RFS HR = 1.93, 95% CI 1.2–3.12, p = 0.007. OS HR: =1.95, 95% CI 1.18–3.23, p = 0.01). In multivariate analysis, the adverse effect of s-ALL on RFS and OS was no longer significant, however a pooled meta-analysis of our and published data indicated that s-ALL is an independent risk factor for lower OS (HR: 1.30, 95% CI: 1.11–1.52, p < 0.01). Myeloablative allogeneic transplantation in s-ALL was associated with lower rates of relapse and higher transplant related mortality without improvement in OS. These data indicate that s-ALL status should be considered for risk- stratification of newly diagnosed ALL. The optimal conditioning regimen for s-ALL patients undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplantation needs to be evaluated in a larger study.
KW - Secondary acute lymphoblastic leukemia
KW - Stem cell transplantation
KW - Therapy-related acute lymphoblastic leukemia
KW - Transplant related mortality
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85051386527&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.leukres.2018.07.024
DO - 10.1016/j.leukres.2018.07.024
M3 - Article
C2 - 30114560
AN - SCOPUS:85051386527
SN - 0145-2126
VL - 72
SP - 86
EP - 91
JO - Leukemia Research
JF - Leukemia Research
ER -