Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Scalable gas diffusion electrode fabrication for electrochemical CO2 reduction using physical vapor deposition methods

  • Feng Jiao
  • , Juergen Biener
  • , Emily Jeng
  • , Zhen Qi
  • , Ajay R. Kashi
  • , Sara Hunegnaw
  • , Ziyang Huo
  • , John S. Miller
  • , Leonardus B. Bayu Aji
  • , Byung Hee Ko
  • , Haeun Shin
  • , Sichao Ma
  • , Kendra P. Kuhl

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Electrochemical CO2 reduction (ECR) promises the replacement of fossil fuels as the source of feedstock chemicals and seasonal storage of renewable energy. While much progress has been made in catalyst development and electrochemical reactor design, few studies have addressed the effect of catalyst integration on device performance. Using a microfluidic gas diffusion electrolyzer, we systematically studied the effect of thickness and the morphology of electron beam (EB) and magnetron-sputtered (MS) Cu catalyst coatings on ECR performance. We observed that EB-Cu outperforms MS-Cu in current density, selectivity, and energy efficiency, with 400 nm thick catalyst coatings performing the best. The superior performance of EB-Cu catalysts is assigned to their faceted surface morphology and sharper Cu/gas diffusion layer interface, which increases their hydrophobicity. Tests in a large-scale zero-gap electrolyzer yielded similar product selectivity distributions with an ethylene Faradaic efficiency of 39% at 200 mA/cm2, demonstrating the scalability for industrial ECR applications.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)7731-7740
Number of pages10
JournalACS Applied Materials and Interfaces
Volume14
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 16 2022

Keywords

  • Catalyst morphology
  • Copper catalyst
  • Electrochemical CO reduction
  • Energy efficiency
  • Physical vapor deposition

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Scalable gas diffusion electrode fabrication for electrochemical CO2 reduction using physical vapor deposition methods'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this