Safety Analyses of the Phase 3 VISION Trial of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 in Patients with Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer

  • Kim N. Chi
  • , Andrew J. Armstrong
  • , Bernd J. Krause
  • , Ken Herrmann
  • , Kambiz Rahbar
  • , Johann S. de Bono
  • , Nabil Adra
  • , Rohan Garje
  • , Jeff M. Michalski
  • , Mette M. Kempel
  • , Karim Fizazi
  • , Michael J. Morris
  • , Oliver Sartor
  • , Marcia Brackman
  • , Michelle DeSilvio
  • , Celine Wilke
  • , Geoffrey Holder
  • , Scott T. Tagawa

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

22 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background and objective: [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 (177Lu-PSMA-617) plus the standard of care (SoC) significantly improved overall survival and radiographic progression-free survival versus SoC alone in patients with prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-positive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer in the VISION trial. We evaluated the safety of additional cycles of 177Lu-PSMA-617 and the impact of longer observation time for patients receiving 177Lu-PSMA-617 plus SoC. Methods: VISION was an international, open-label study. Patients were randomised 2:1 to receive 177Lu-PSMA-617 plus SoC or SoC alone. The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) was assessed in prespecified subgroups of patients who received ≤4 cycles versus 5–6 cycles of treatment and during each cycle of treatment. The TEAE incidence was also adjusted for treatment exposure to calculate the incidence per 100 patient-treatment years of observation. This analysis was performed for the first occurrence of TEAEs. Key findings and limitations: The any-grade TEAE incidence was similar in cycles 1–4 and cycles 5–6. TEAE frequency was similar across all cycles of 177Lu-PSMA-617 treatment. No additional safety concerns were reported for patients who received >4 cycles. The exposure-adjusted safety analysis revealed that the overall TEAE incidence was similar between arms, but distinct trends for different TEAE types were noted and the incidence of events associated with 177Lu-PSMA-617 remained higher in the 177Lu-PSMA-617 arm. Conclusions and clinical implications: Longer exposure to 177Lu-PSMA-617 plus SoC was not associated with a higher toxicity risk, and the extended time for safety observation could account for the higher TEAE incidence in comparison to SoC alone. The findings support a favourable benefit-risk profile for 6 cycles of 177Lu-PSMA-617 in this setting and the use of up to 6 cycles of 177Lu-PSMA-617 in patients who are clinically benefiting from and tolerating this therapy. Patient summary: For patients with metastatic prostate cancer no longer responding to hormone therapy, an increase in the number of cycles of treatment with a radioactive compound called 177Lu-PSMA-617 from four to six had no additional adverse side effects.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)382-391
Number of pages10
JournalEuropean Urology
Volume85
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2024

Keywords

  • Lu-PSMA-617
  • Metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer
  • Radioligand therapy
  • Treatment exposure
  • Treatment-emergent adverse events

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Safety Analyses of the Phase 3 VISION Trial of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 in Patients with Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this