TY - JOUR
T1 - Safe prescribing
T2 - An educational intervention for medical students
AU - Garbutt, Jane M.
AU - DeFer, Thomas M.
AU - Highstein, Gabrielle
AU - McNaughton, Candace
AU - Milligan, Paul
AU - Fraser, Victoria F.
PY - 2006/6
Y1 - 2006/6
N2 - Background and Purpose: Errors in handwritten medication orders are common and can result in patient harm. We evaluated an intervention for increasing safe prescribing by medical students. Methods: We conducted a pre-post evaluation to evaluate a brief educational intervention to increase safe prescribing by medical students. Two 1-hr, small-group, interactive educational sessions for 3rd-year medical students were held 2 weeks apart at Washington University in St. Louis. Prescribing errors were measured with a verbal transcription test. Results: Twenty-eight students participated. Following the intervention, the average number of error-free orders in the 10-order test increased 5-fold from 0.82 per student to 4.54 per student, and the average number of errors and dangerous errors per student decreased from 13.96 to 7.36 (p < .0001) and from 4.75 to 2.68 (p < .0001), respectively. Conclusions: After a brief interactive educational intervention for medical students, the frequency of error-free handwritten orders increased, and prescribing errors decreased. Additional training may be required to further improve and maintain safe prescribing.
AB - Background and Purpose: Errors in handwritten medication orders are common and can result in patient harm. We evaluated an intervention for increasing safe prescribing by medical students. Methods: We conducted a pre-post evaluation to evaluate a brief educational intervention to increase safe prescribing by medical students. Two 1-hr, small-group, interactive educational sessions for 3rd-year medical students were held 2 weeks apart at Washington University in St. Louis. Prescribing errors were measured with a verbal transcription test. Results: Twenty-eight students participated. Following the intervention, the average number of error-free orders in the 10-order test increased 5-fold from 0.82 per student to 4.54 per student, and the average number of errors and dangerous errors per student decreased from 13.96 to 7.36 (p < .0001) and from 4.75 to 2.68 (p < .0001), respectively. Conclusions: After a brief interactive educational intervention for medical students, the frequency of error-free handwritten orders increased, and prescribing errors decreased. Additional training may be required to further improve and maintain safe prescribing.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33746845656&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1207/s15328015tlm1803_10
DO - 10.1207/s15328015tlm1803_10
M3 - Article
C2 - 16776613
AN - SCOPUS:33746845656
SN - 1040-1334
VL - 18
SP - 244
EP - 250
JO - Teaching and Learning in Medicine
JF - Teaching and Learning in Medicine
IS - 3
ER -