Safe or sorry? Cancer screening and inductive risk

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

14 Scopus citations

Abstract

The general assumption behind cancer screening has been that early diagnosis and treatment is effective at reducing cancer-related mortality; this is broadly speaking true, for some cancer screening efforts, in some age groups. However, screening may in some cases do more harm than good. One source of harm is overdiagnosis and overtreatment, the diagnosis and treatment of indolent or slow-growing disease that may never lead to morbidity or mortality in the lifetime of the patient. Precaution in cancer screening is thus a double-edged sword: early diagnosis and treatment has clear benefits; but it is also true that some percentage of patients is unnecessarily treated. This chapter will examine how inductive risk and values come into play in debates about mammography screening.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationExploring Inductive Risk
Subtitle of host publicationCase Studies of Values in Science
PublisherOxford University Press
Pages149-170
Number of pages22
ISBN (Electronic)9780190467715
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2017

Keywords

  • Cancer screening
  • Inductive risk
  • Mammography
  • Overdiagnosis
  • Overtreatment
  • Values

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Safe or sorry? Cancer screening and inductive risk'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this