TY - JOUR
T1 - Rural-urban differences in radiation therapy for ductal carcinoma in-situ of the breast
AU - Schootman, Mario
AU - Aft, Rebecca
PY - 2001
Y1 - 2001
N2 - Purpose. Rural women in the United States are at a documented disadvantage with regard to breast cancer detection, diagnosis, and treatment and generally do not receive state-of-the-art therapy. The objective of the study was to determine if, and to what extent, rural women were less likely to receive radiation therapy (XRT) following breast conserving surgery (BCS) for ductal carcinoma in-situ (DCIS). Methods. Our analyses were based on 1991-1996 data provided by the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program. Only women who were diagnosed with their first primary, microscopically confirmed DCIS breast cancer were included. BCS and XRT were defined according to SEER definitions. Multiple logistic regression was used in the analysis. Results. During this time period, 6,988 women were treated with BCS for DCIS, 50.1% of whom received XRT. In multivariate analysis, rural women in general (OR = 0.58) and younger women (<65) in particular (OR = 0.38) were less likely to receive XRT. Local availability of XRT was not associated with receipt among younger women, while older women without this availability were less likely to receive XRT (OR = 0.48). Conclusions. Barriers to XRT following BCS for DCIS may be different between younger and older rural women relative to their urban counterparts.
AB - Purpose. Rural women in the United States are at a documented disadvantage with regard to breast cancer detection, diagnosis, and treatment and generally do not receive state-of-the-art therapy. The objective of the study was to determine if, and to what extent, rural women were less likely to receive radiation therapy (XRT) following breast conserving surgery (BCS) for ductal carcinoma in-situ (DCIS). Methods. Our analyses were based on 1991-1996 data provided by the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program. Only women who were diagnosed with their first primary, microscopically confirmed DCIS breast cancer were included. BCS and XRT were defined according to SEER definitions. Multiple logistic regression was used in the analysis. Results. During this time period, 6,988 women were treated with BCS for DCIS, 50.1% of whom received XRT. In multivariate analysis, rural women in general (OR = 0.58) and younger women (<65) in particular (OR = 0.38) were less likely to receive XRT. Local availability of XRT was not associated with receipt among younger women, while older women without this availability were less likely to receive XRT (OR = 0.48). Conclusions. Barriers to XRT following BCS for DCIS may be different between younger and older rural women relative to their urban counterparts.
KW - DCIS
KW - Radiation therapy
KW - Rural women
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034793213&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1023/A:1011915323038
DO - 10.1023/A:1011915323038
M3 - Article
C2 - 11688515
AN - SCOPUS:0034793213
SN - 0167-6806
VL - 68
SP - 117
EP - 125
JO - Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
JF - Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
IS - 2
ER -