Rumination and worry in daily life: Examining the naturalistic validity of theoretical constructs

  • Katharina Kircanski
  • , Renee J. Thompson
  • , James E. Sorenson
  • , Lindsey Sherdell
  • , Ian H. Gotlib

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

96 Scopus citations

Abstract

Rumination and worry, two forms of perseverative thinking, hold promise as core processes that transect depressive and anxiety disorders. Whereas previous studies have been limited to the laboratory or to single diagnoses, we used an experience sampling methodology to assess and validate rumination and worry as transdiagnostic phenomena in the daily lives of individuals diagnosed with major depressive disorder (MDD), generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), and co-occurring MDD-GAD. Clinical and healthy control participants carried a handheld electronic device for one week. Eight times per day they reported on their current levels of rumination and worry and their theoretically postulated features: thought unpleasantness, repetitiveness, abstractness, uncontrollability, temporal orientation, and content, and overall senses of certainty and control. Both rumination and worry emerged as transdiagnostic processes that cut across MDD, GAD, and MDD-GAD. Furthermore, most psychological theories concerning rumination and worry strongly mapped onto participants’ reports, providing the first naturalistic validation of these constructs.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)926-939
Number of pages14
JournalClinical Psychological Science
Volume3
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2015

Keywords

  • Experience sampling method
  • Generalized anxiety disorder
  • Major depressive disorder
  • Rumination
  • Transdiagnostic
  • Worry

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Rumination and worry in daily life: Examining the naturalistic validity of theoretical constructs'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this