TY - JOUR
T1 - Role-Play Assessment of Therapist Adherence and Skill in Implementation of Trauma-Focused Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy
AU - Marriott, Brigid R.
AU - Cho, Evelyn
AU - Tugendrajch, Siena K.
AU - Kliethermes, Matthew D.
AU - McMillen, J. Curtis
AU - Proctor, Enola K.
AU - Hawley, Kristin M.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
PY - 2022/5
Y1 - 2022/5
N2 - Numerous efforts are underway to train clinicians in evidence-based practices. Unfortunately, the field has few practical measures of therapist adherence and skill with which to judge the success of these training and implementation efforts. One possible assessment method is using behavioral rehearsal, or role-play, as an analogue for therapist in-session behavior. The current study describes aspects of reliability, validity and utility of a behavioral role-play assessment developed to evaluate therapist adherence and skill in implementing Trauma-Focused Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy (TF-CBT). TF-CBT role-play assessments were conducted with a sample of 43 therapists as part of a larger training study. The TF-CBT role-play assessments were independently coded for TF-CBT adherence and skill by a certified TF-CBT trainer and three clinical psychology doctoral students. Findings indicated good interrater reliability for the individual items (ICC: M =.71, SD =.15). Regarding utility, 67.19% (n = 43/64) of contacted therapists completed the role-play assessment, which took an average of 30 min (M = 31.42, SD = 5.65) to complete and 60 min (M = 62.84, SD = 11.31) to code. Therapists with a master’s degree were more likely to complete the role-play assessment than those with other degrees but no other differences in demographic variables, practice characteristics, or TF-CBT knowledge or training were found between participants and nonparticipants. Role-play assessments may offer an alternative to observational coding for assessing therapist adherence and skill, particularly in contexts where session recordings are not feasible.
AB - Numerous efforts are underway to train clinicians in evidence-based practices. Unfortunately, the field has few practical measures of therapist adherence and skill with which to judge the success of these training and implementation efforts. One possible assessment method is using behavioral rehearsal, or role-play, as an analogue for therapist in-session behavior. The current study describes aspects of reliability, validity and utility of a behavioral role-play assessment developed to evaluate therapist adherence and skill in implementing Trauma-Focused Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy (TF-CBT). TF-CBT role-play assessments were conducted with a sample of 43 therapists as part of a larger training study. The TF-CBT role-play assessments were independently coded for TF-CBT adherence and skill by a certified TF-CBT trainer and three clinical psychology doctoral students. Findings indicated good interrater reliability for the individual items (ICC: M =.71, SD =.15). Regarding utility, 67.19% (n = 43/64) of contacted therapists completed the role-play assessment, which took an average of 30 min (M = 31.42, SD = 5.65) to complete and 60 min (M = 62.84, SD = 11.31) to code. Therapists with a master’s degree were more likely to complete the role-play assessment than those with other degrees but no other differences in demographic variables, practice characteristics, or TF-CBT knowledge or training were found between participants and nonparticipants. Role-play assessments may offer an alternative to observational coding for assessing therapist adherence and skill, particularly in contexts where session recordings are not feasible.
KW - Adherence
KW - Implementation
KW - Skill
KW - TF-CBT
KW - Training
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85115230776
U2 - 10.1007/s10488-021-01169-9
DO - 10.1007/s10488-021-01169-9
M3 - Article
C2 - 34546482
AN - SCOPUS:85115230776
SN - 0894-587X
VL - 49
SP - 374
EP - 384
JO - Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research
JF - Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research
IS - 3
ER -