TY - JOUR
T1 - Role of visual pigment properties in rod and cone phototransduction
AU - Kefalov, Vladimir
AU - Fu, Yingbin
AU - Marsh-Amstrong, Nicholas
AU - Yau, King Wai
N1 - Funding Information:
Acknowledgements We thank J. Lai, Y. Liang and R. Bruno for help with generating transgenic frogs; J. Nathans for the human rhodopsin and red cone opsin cDNAs and the antibody to red opsin; V. Bhandawat for suggesting the program for computer simulations of random events; and D. A. Baylor, M. E. Burns, S. Kawamura, E. N. Pugh Jr, F. Rieke, J. L. Schnapf, Y. Shichida and members of the Yau laboratory for discussions and comments on the manuscript. This work was supported by the US National Eye Institute.
PY - 2003/10/2
Y1 - 2003/10/2
N2 - Retinal rods and cones share a phototransduction pathway involving cylic GMP. Cones are typically 100 times less photosensitive than rods and their response kinetics are several times faster, but the underlying mechanisms remain largely unknown. Almost all proteins involved in phototransduction have distinct rod and cone variants. Differences in properties between rod and cone pigments have been described, such as a 10-fold shorter lifetime of the meta-II state (active conformation) of cone pigment and its higher rate of spontaneous isomerization, but their contributions to the functional differences between rods and cones remain speculative. We have addressed this question by expressing human or salamander red cone pigment in Xenopus rods, and human rod pigment in Xenopus cones. Here we show that rod and cone pigments when present in the same cell produce light responses with identical amplification and kinetics, thereby ruling out any difference in their signalling properties. However, red cone pigment isomerizes spontaneously 10,000 times more frequently than rod pigment. This high spontaneous activity adapts the native cones even in darkness, making them less sensitive and kinetically faster than rods. Nevertheless, additional factors are probably involved in these differences.
AB - Retinal rods and cones share a phototransduction pathway involving cylic GMP. Cones are typically 100 times less photosensitive than rods and their response kinetics are several times faster, but the underlying mechanisms remain largely unknown. Almost all proteins involved in phototransduction have distinct rod and cone variants. Differences in properties between rod and cone pigments have been described, such as a 10-fold shorter lifetime of the meta-II state (active conformation) of cone pigment and its higher rate of spontaneous isomerization, but their contributions to the functional differences between rods and cones remain speculative. We have addressed this question by expressing human or salamander red cone pigment in Xenopus rods, and human rod pigment in Xenopus cones. Here we show that rod and cone pigments when present in the same cell produce light responses with identical amplification and kinetics, thereby ruling out any difference in their signalling properties. However, red cone pigment isomerizes spontaneously 10,000 times more frequently than rod pigment. This high spontaneous activity adapts the native cones even in darkness, making them less sensitive and kinetically faster than rods. Nevertheless, additional factors are probably involved in these differences.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0141894860&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1038/nature01992
DO - 10.1038/nature01992
M3 - Article
C2 - 14523449
AN - SCOPUS:0141894860
SN - 0028-0836
VL - 425
SP - 526
EP - 531
JO - Nature
JF - Nature
IS - 6957
ER -