TY - JOUR
T1 - Robotic Approach to Paraesophageal Hernia Repair Results in Low Long-Term Recurrence Rate and Beneficial Patient-Centered Outcomes
AU - Gerull, William D.
AU - Cho, Daniel
AU - Kuo, Iris
AU - Arefanian, Saeed
AU - Kushner, Bradley S.
AU - Awad, Michael M.
N1 - Funding Information:
Disclosures outside the scope of this work: Dr Awad’s institution received educational research grants from Applied Medical; Baxter; Bard; Ethicon, Inc; Intuitive Surgical, Inc; and Medtronic; and Dr Awad received speaker honoraria from Intuitive Surgical, Inc. Other authors have nothing to disclose.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 American College of Surgeons
PY - 2020/11
Y1 - 2020/11
N2 - Background: Little is known regarding important long-term outcomes after robotic paraesophageal hernia (PEH) repairs, such as symptom relief and recurrence rates. The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term clinical outcomes in a large series of patients undergoing robotic PEH repair. Study Design: This prospective, IRB-approved study analyzed adult patients who underwent robotic PEH repair, from 2010 to 2014, at a high-volume tertiary academic medical center. Detailed information on patient characteristics, perioperative factors, and long-term patient-reported outcomes for up to 5 years postoperatively were collected. Objective long-term outcomes included radiographic evidence of PEH recurrence at 1, 3, and 5 years postoperatively. Results: A total of 233 patients underwent robotic PEH repair during the study period—70% were primary, 30% were revisional. Seventy-eight percent of patients (181) had a type III PEH, 21% (49) had a type IV, and 1% (3) had a type II. At 5 years postoperatively, 62% of patients (145 of 233) were available for follow-up, with a radiographic recurrence rate of 9% (13 of 145). Additionally, there was a significant improvement in the GERD-HRQL score at 5 years postoperatively (preoperative: 25.6 ± 8.7, 5-year postoperative, 4.5 ± 1.7, p < 0.01, 95% CI 19.7 to 22.5). Conclusions: This study represents one of the largest longitudinal robotic foregut surgical databases to date. Our results demonstrate that robotic PEH repair with an experienced surgical team is a safe and effective alternative to laparoscopic repair, with excellent long-term outcomes, including a very low recurrence rate.
AB - Background: Little is known regarding important long-term outcomes after robotic paraesophageal hernia (PEH) repairs, such as symptom relief and recurrence rates. The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term clinical outcomes in a large series of patients undergoing robotic PEH repair. Study Design: This prospective, IRB-approved study analyzed adult patients who underwent robotic PEH repair, from 2010 to 2014, at a high-volume tertiary academic medical center. Detailed information on patient characteristics, perioperative factors, and long-term patient-reported outcomes for up to 5 years postoperatively were collected. Objective long-term outcomes included radiographic evidence of PEH recurrence at 1, 3, and 5 years postoperatively. Results: A total of 233 patients underwent robotic PEH repair during the study period—70% were primary, 30% were revisional. Seventy-eight percent of patients (181) had a type III PEH, 21% (49) had a type IV, and 1% (3) had a type II. At 5 years postoperatively, 62% of patients (145 of 233) were available for follow-up, with a radiographic recurrence rate of 9% (13 of 145). Additionally, there was a significant improvement in the GERD-HRQL score at 5 years postoperatively (preoperative: 25.6 ± 8.7, 5-year postoperative, 4.5 ± 1.7, p < 0.01, 95% CI 19.7 to 22.5). Conclusions: This study represents one of the largest longitudinal robotic foregut surgical databases to date. Our results demonstrate that robotic PEH repair with an experienced surgical team is a safe and effective alternative to laparoscopic repair, with excellent long-term outcomes, including a very low recurrence rate.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85090299289&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2020.07.754
DO - 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2020.07.754
M3 - Article
C2 - 32758533
AN - SCOPUS:85090299289
SN - 1072-7515
VL - 231
SP - 520
EP - 526
JO - Journal of the American College of Surgeons
JF - Journal of the American College of Surgeons
IS - 5
ER -