TY - JOUR
T1 - Risk Stratification of the Potentially Septic Patient in the Emergency Department
T2 - The Mortality in the Emergency Department Sepsis (MEDS) Score
AU - Carpenter, Christopher R.
AU - Keim, Samuel M.
AU - Upadhye, Suneel
AU - Nguyen, H. Bryant
PY - 2009/10
Y1 - 2009/10
N2 - Background: The prompt recognition and management of septic patients remains a challenge within the busy Emergency Department (ED). Prognostic screening aids have traditionally required time-delayed laboratory measurements not validated upon the emergency medicine population. Recently, a brief prognostic tool has been derived and subsequently validated in heterogeneous ED populations. Clinical Question: Can a risk-stratification tool predict 1-month mortality in ED patients with suspected infection? Evidence Review: Six studies evaluating the Mortality in the Emergency Department Sepsis (MEDS) score were identified and evaluated. Results: Higher MEDS scores are associated with increasing mortality. MEDS score's short- and long-term prognostic accuracy is superior to other sepsis scales as well as isolated biomarkers C-reactive protein and procalcitonin. MEDS' prognostic accuracy in severe sepsis is inferior to undifferentiated systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) patients. Conclusion: The MEDS score is an accurate and reliable prognostic tool for 28-day mortality in ED SIRS patients, but may not be optimal for those with severe sepsis.
AB - Background: The prompt recognition and management of septic patients remains a challenge within the busy Emergency Department (ED). Prognostic screening aids have traditionally required time-delayed laboratory measurements not validated upon the emergency medicine population. Recently, a brief prognostic tool has been derived and subsequently validated in heterogeneous ED populations. Clinical Question: Can a risk-stratification tool predict 1-month mortality in ED patients with suspected infection? Evidence Review: Six studies evaluating the Mortality in the Emergency Department Sepsis (MEDS) score were identified and evaluated. Results: Higher MEDS scores are associated with increasing mortality. MEDS score's short- and long-term prognostic accuracy is superior to other sepsis scales as well as isolated biomarkers C-reactive protein and procalcitonin. MEDS' prognostic accuracy in severe sepsis is inferior to undifferentiated systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) patients. Conclusion: The MEDS score is an accurate and reliable prognostic tool for 28-day mortality in ED SIRS patients, but may not be optimal for those with severe sepsis.
KW - clinical decision rules
KW - evidence-based medicine
KW - sepsis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70349101682&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jemermed.2009.03.016
DO - 10.1016/j.jemermed.2009.03.016
M3 - Article
C2 - 19427752
AN - SCOPUS:70349101682
SN - 0736-4679
VL - 37
SP - 319
EP - 327
JO - Journal of Emergency Medicine
JF - Journal of Emergency Medicine
IS - 3
ER -