Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Outcomes at a Minimum of 5-Year Follow-Up: A Systematic Review

Rick W. Wright; Lea Johnson; Robert H. Brophy; Ljiljana Bogunovic; Matthew J. Matava; Matthew V. Smith

doi:10.1055/s-0038-1641137

Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Outcomes at a Minimum of 5-Year Follow-Up: A Systematic Review

Rick W. Wright, Lea Johnson, Robert H. Brophy, Ljiljana Bogunovic, Matthew J. Matava, Matthew V. Smith

Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › peer-review

10 Scopus citations

Abstract

Revision anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction typically has worse outcomes than primary reconstructions. Minimal long-term data exist regarding 5-year results. We chose to perform a systematic review to evaluate midterm (5-year) revision ACL reconstruction outcomes (patient-reported outcomes, reoperation, stability, arthritis) in comparison to primary ACL reconstructions at similar time points. Embase, Cochrane, and PubMed databases were queried, and four studies met the inclusion criteria. Two authors reviewed and performed data extraction. All were level 4 studies. Review of the studies demonstrated that results at 5 years are consistently worse than those noted in primary reconstructions for objective and patient-reported outcomes. Revision ACL reconstruction outcomes remain worse than primary reconstructions at midterm 5-year follow-up. The level of evidence is 4.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	218-221
Number of pages	4
Journal	Journal of Knee Surgery
Volume	32
Issue number	3
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1641137
State	Published - Jan 1 2019

Keywords

anterior cruciate ligament
outcomes
revision ACL reconstruction

Access to Document

10.1055/s-0038-1641137

Cite this

@article{9ea71093958349a4a148c7f6c5eb8bee,

title = "Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Outcomes at a Minimum of 5-Year Follow-Up: A Systematic Review",

abstract = "Revision anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction typically has worse outcomes than primary reconstructions. Minimal long-term data exist regarding 5-year results. We chose to perform a systematic review to evaluate midterm (5-year) revision ACL reconstruction outcomes (patient-reported outcomes, reoperation, stability, arthritis) in comparison to primary ACL reconstructions at similar time points. Embase, Cochrane, and PubMed databases were queried, and four studies met the inclusion criteria. Two authors reviewed and performed data extraction. All were level 4 studies. Review of the studies demonstrated that results at 5 years are consistently worse than those noted in primary reconstructions for objective and patient-reported outcomes. Revision ACL reconstruction outcomes remain worse than primary reconstructions at midterm 5-year follow-up. The level of evidence is 4.",

keywords = "anterior cruciate ligament, outcomes, revision ACL reconstruction",

author = "Wright, {Rick W.} and Lea Johnson and Brophy, {Robert H.} and Ljiljana Bogunovic and Matava, {Matthew J.} and Smith, {Matthew V.}",

year = "2019",

month = jan,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1055/s-0038-1641137",

language = "English",

volume = "32",

pages = "218--221",

journal = "Journal of Knee Surgery",

issn = "1538-8506",

number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Outcomes at a Minimum of 5-Year Follow-Up

T2 - A Systematic Review

AU - Wright, Rick W.

AU - Johnson, Lea

AU - Brophy, Robert H.

AU - Bogunovic, Ljiljana

AU - Matava, Matthew J.

AU - Smith, Matthew V.

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Revision anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction typically has worse outcomes than primary reconstructions. Minimal long-term data exist regarding 5-year results. We chose to perform a systematic review to evaluate midterm (5-year) revision ACL reconstruction outcomes (patient-reported outcomes, reoperation, stability, arthritis) in comparison to primary ACL reconstructions at similar time points. Embase, Cochrane, and PubMed databases were queried, and four studies met the inclusion criteria. Two authors reviewed and performed data extraction. All were level 4 studies. Review of the studies demonstrated that results at 5 years are consistently worse than those noted in primary reconstructions for objective and patient-reported outcomes. Revision ACL reconstruction outcomes remain worse than primary reconstructions at midterm 5-year follow-up. The level of evidence is 4.

AB - Revision anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction typically has worse outcomes than primary reconstructions. Minimal long-term data exist regarding 5-year results. We chose to perform a systematic review to evaluate midterm (5-year) revision ACL reconstruction outcomes (patient-reported outcomes, reoperation, stability, arthritis) in comparison to primary ACL reconstructions at similar time points. Embase, Cochrane, and PubMed databases were queried, and four studies met the inclusion criteria. Two authors reviewed and performed data extraction. All were level 4 studies. Review of the studies demonstrated that results at 5 years are consistently worse than those noted in primary reconstructions for objective and patient-reported outcomes. Revision ACL reconstruction outcomes remain worse than primary reconstructions at midterm 5-year follow-up. The level of evidence is 4.

KW - anterior cruciate ligament

KW - outcomes

KW - revision ACL reconstruction

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85045692402&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1055/s-0038-1641137

DO - 10.1055/s-0038-1641137

M3 - Review article

C2 - 29653445

AN - SCOPUS:85045692402

SN - 1538-8506

VL - 32

SP - 218

EP - 221

JO - Journal of Knee Surgery

JF - Journal of Knee Surgery

IS - 3

ER -

Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Outcomes at a Minimum of 5-Year Follow-Up: A Systematic Review

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this