Reviewers on Reviewing for Psychological, Health and Medical Journals

Barry A. Hong; Elizabeth D. Cash; Barbara A. Cubic; Danny Wedding

doi:10.1007/s10880-021-09821-0

Reviewers on Reviewing for Psychological, Health and Medical Journals

Barry A. Hong, Elizabeth D. Cash, Barbara A. Cubic, Danny Wedding

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

Being a reviewer is an honor and it continues to be a very rewarding experience throughout a career. Reviewers get the opportunity to maintain scientific standards and assist in growing the scientific psychological literature. Being a reviewer enhances and integrates scientific values and clinical skills following the scientist-practitioner model. However, for the inexperienced reviewer, the experience can be very scary and intimidating. Everyone’s experience with reviewing is highly personal and at the same time, the activity is both common and universal for academic psychologists. In this interview article, three seasoned reviewers respond to questions about their experience as journal reviewers reflecting in their answers their collective wisdom and knowledge in this area.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	659-665
Number of pages	7
Journal	Journal of clinical psychology in medical settings
Volume	28
Issue number	4
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1007/s10880-021-09821-0
State	Published - Dec 2021

Keywords

Edit
Ethics
Medical
Psychological
Review

Access to Document

10.1007/s10880-021-09821-0

Cite this

@article{1996e3005d0a4413a4548a50a9d7952b,

title = "Reviewers on Reviewing for Psychological, Health and Medical Journals",

abstract = "Being a reviewer is an honor and it continues to be a very rewarding experience throughout a career. Reviewers get the opportunity to maintain scientific standards and assist in growing the scientific psychological literature. Being a reviewer enhances and integrates scientific values and clinical skills following the scientist-practitioner model. However, for the inexperienced reviewer, the experience can be very scary and intimidating. Everyone{\textquoteright}s experience with reviewing is highly personal and at the same time, the activity is both common and universal for academic psychologists. In this interview article, three seasoned reviewers respond to questions about their experience as journal reviewers reflecting in their answers their collective wisdom and knowledge in this area.",

keywords = "Edit, Ethics, Medical, Psychological, Review",

author = "Hong, {Barry A.} and Cash, {Elizabeth D.} and Cubic, {Barbara A.} and Danny Wedding",

note = "Funding Information: The authors wish to acknowledge and thank Dana Downs for his contribution to the preparation and management of this manuscript. Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2021, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.",

year = "2021",

month = dec,

doi = "10.1007/s10880-021-09821-0",

language = "English",

volume = "28",

pages = "659--665",

journal = "Journal of clinical psychology in medical settings",

issn = "1068-9583",

number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reviewers on Reviewing for Psychological, Health and Medical Journals

AU - Hong, Barry A.

AU - Cash, Elizabeth D.

AU - Cubic, Barbara A.

AU - Wedding, Danny

N1 - Funding Information: The authors wish to acknowledge and thank Dana Downs for his contribution to the preparation and management of this manuscript. Publisher Copyright: © 2021, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

PY - 2021/12

Y1 - 2021/12

N2 - Being a reviewer is an honor and it continues to be a very rewarding experience throughout a career. Reviewers get the opportunity to maintain scientific standards and assist in growing the scientific psychological literature. Being a reviewer enhances and integrates scientific values and clinical skills following the scientist-practitioner model. However, for the inexperienced reviewer, the experience can be very scary and intimidating. Everyone’s experience with reviewing is highly personal and at the same time, the activity is both common and universal for academic psychologists. In this interview article, three seasoned reviewers respond to questions about their experience as journal reviewers reflecting in their answers their collective wisdom and knowledge in this area.

AB - Being a reviewer is an honor and it continues to be a very rewarding experience throughout a career. Reviewers get the opportunity to maintain scientific standards and assist in growing the scientific psychological literature. Being a reviewer enhances and integrates scientific values and clinical skills following the scientist-practitioner model. However, for the inexperienced reviewer, the experience can be very scary and intimidating. Everyone’s experience with reviewing is highly personal and at the same time, the activity is both common and universal for academic psychologists. In this interview article, three seasoned reviewers respond to questions about their experience as journal reviewers reflecting in their answers their collective wisdom and knowledge in this area.

KW - Edit

KW - Ethics

KW - Medical

KW - Psychological

KW - Review

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85115193207&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10880-021-09821-0

DO - 10.1007/s10880-021-09821-0

M3 - Article

C2 - 34536166

AN - SCOPUS:85115193207

SN - 1068-9583

VL - 28

SP - 659

EP - 665

JO - Journal of clinical psychology in medical settings

JF - Journal of clinical psychology in medical settings

IS - 4

ER -

Reviewers on Reviewing for Psychological, Health and Medical Journals

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this