Retrospective case series analysis of RAF family alterations in pancreatic cancer: Real-world outcomes from targeted and standard therapies

  • Andrew Hendifar
  • , Edik M. Blais
  • , Brian Wolpin
  • , Vivek Subbiah
  • , Eric Collisson
  • , Isha Singh
  • , Timothy Cannon
  • , Kenna Shaw
  • , Emanuel F. Petricoin
  • , Samuel Klempner
  • , Emily Lyons
  • , Andrea Wang-Gillam
  • , Michael J. Pishvaian
  • , Eileen M. O’Reilly

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

33 Scopus citations

Abstract

PURPOSE In pancreatic cancer (PC), the RAF family alterations define a rare subset of patients that may predict response to inhibition of the BRAF/MEK/ERK signaling pathway. A comprehensive understanding of the molecular and clinical characteristics of RAF-mutated PC may support future development of RAF-directed strategies. METHODS Clinical outcomes were assessed across a multi-institutional case series of 81 patients with RAF family-mutated PC. Mutational subgroups were defined on the basis of RAF alteration hotspots and therapeutic implications. RESULTS The frequency of RAF alterations in PC was 2.2% (84 of 3,781) within a prevalence cohort derived from large molecular databases where BRAF V600E (Exon 15), BRAF ΔNVTAP (Exon 11), and SND1-BRAF fusions were the most common variants. In our retrospective case series, we identified 17 of 81 (21.0%) molecular profiles with a BRAF V600/Exon 15 mutation without any confounding drivers, 25 of 81 (30.9%) with BRAF or RAF1 fusions, and 18 of 81 (22.2%) with Exon 11 mutations. The remaining 21 of 81 (25.9%) profiles had atypical RAF variants and/or multiple oncogenic drivers. Clinical benefit from BRAF/MEK/ERK inhibitors was observed in 3 of 3 subjects within the V600 subgroup (two partial responses), 4 of 6 with fusions (two partial responses), 2 of 6 with Exon 11 mutations (one partial response), and 0 of 3 with confounding drivers. Outcomes analyses also suggested a trend favoring fluorouracil-based regimens over gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel within the fusion subgroup (P = .027). CONCLUSION Prospective evaluation of RAF-directed therapies is warranted in RAF-mutated PC; however, differential responses to targeted agents or standard regimens for each mutational subgroup should be a consideration when designing clinical trials.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1325-1338
Number of pages14
JournalJCO Precision Oncology
Volume5
DOIs
StatePublished - 2021

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Retrospective case series analysis of RAF family alterations in pancreatic cancer: Real-world outcomes from targeted and standard therapies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this