Retention and outcomes of National Diabetes Prevention Program enrollees and non-enrollees with prediabetes: The University of Michigan experience

William H. Herman, Claudia Villatoro, Kevin L. Joiner, Laura N. McEwen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Aims: To evaluate retention and outcomes of insured adults with prediabetes who enrolled or did not enroll in National Diabetes Prevention Programs (NDPPs). Methods: Between 2015 and 2019, 776 University of Michigan employees, dependents, and retirees with prediabetes and overweight or obesity enrolled in one-year NDPPs. Results: Enrollees attended a median of 18 sessions. Median retention was 38 weeks. Retention was associated with older age, greater initial weight loss, and physical activity. At both 1- and 2-years, body mass index, triglycerides, and HbA1c were significantly improved among enrollees. After adjusting for age group, sex, and race, the odds of developing diabetes based on HbA1c ≥6.5 % was 40 % lower at 1-year and 20 % lower at 2-years, and the odds of self-reported diabetes was 57 % lower at 1-year and 46 % lower at 2-years in enrollees compared to non-enrollees. Enrollees who disenrolled before completing the core curriculum had higher odds and enrollees who completed the NDPP had lower odds of developing diabetes that non-enrollees. Conclusions: In this population with prediabetes, NDPP retention was generally good, risk factors were improved, and diabetes was delayed or prevented for up to two years.

Original languageEnglish
Article number108527
JournalJournal of Diabetes and Its Complications
Volume37
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2023

Keywords

  • Diabetes incidence
  • Lifestyle intervention
  • Prediabetes
  • Prospective observational study
  • Retention
  • Type 2 diabetes prevention

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Retention and outcomes of National Diabetes Prevention Program enrollees and non-enrollees with prediabetes: The University of Michigan experience'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this