TY - JOUR
T1 - Results from a psychometric assessment of a new tool for measuring evidence-based decision making in public health organizations
AU - Stamatakis, Katherine A.
AU - Ferreira Hino, Adriano Akira
AU - Allen, Peg
AU - McQueen, Amy
AU - Jacob, Rebekah R.
AU - Baker, Elizabeth A.
AU - Brownson, Ross C.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016
PY - 2017/2/1
Y1 - 2017/2/1
N2 - Background In order to better understand how to improve evidence-based decision making (EBDM) in state health departments, measurement tools are needed to evaluate changes in EBDM. The purpose of this study was to test the psychometric properties of a new measurement tool to assess EBDM in public health practice settings. Methods A questionnaire was developed, pilot-tested and refined in an iterative process with the input of public health practitioners with the aim of identifying a set of specific measures representing different components of EBDM. Data were collected in a national survey of state health department chronic disease practitioners. The final dataset (n = 879) for psychometric testing was comprised of 19 EBDM items that were first examined using exploratory factor analysis, and then confirmatory factor analysis. Results The final model from confirmatory factor analysis includes five latent factors representing components of EBDM: capacity for evaluation, expectations and incentives for EBDM, access to evidence and resources for EBDM, participatory decision making, and leadership support and commitment. Conclusions This study addresses the need for empirically tested and theory-aligned measures that may be used to assess the extent to which EBDM is currently implemented, and further, to gauge the success of strategies to improve EBDM, in public health settings. This EBDM measurement tool may help identify needed supports for enhanced capacity and implementation of effective strategies.
AB - Background In order to better understand how to improve evidence-based decision making (EBDM) in state health departments, measurement tools are needed to evaluate changes in EBDM. The purpose of this study was to test the psychometric properties of a new measurement tool to assess EBDM in public health practice settings. Methods A questionnaire was developed, pilot-tested and refined in an iterative process with the input of public health practitioners with the aim of identifying a set of specific measures representing different components of EBDM. Data were collected in a national survey of state health department chronic disease practitioners. The final dataset (n = 879) for psychometric testing was comprised of 19 EBDM items that were first examined using exploratory factor analysis, and then confirmatory factor analysis. Results The final model from confirmatory factor analysis includes five latent factors representing components of EBDM: capacity for evaluation, expectations and incentives for EBDM, access to evidence and resources for EBDM, participatory decision making, and leadership support and commitment. Conclusions This study addresses the need for empirically tested and theory-aligned measures that may be used to assess the extent to which EBDM is currently implemented, and further, to gauge the success of strategies to improve EBDM, in public health settings. This EBDM measurement tool may help identify needed supports for enhanced capacity and implementation of effective strategies.
KW - Confirmatory factor analysis
KW - Evidence-based decision making
KW - Measurement
KW - Public health
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84988487542&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2016.08.002
DO - 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2016.08.002
M3 - Article
C2 - 27665067
AN - SCOPUS:84988487542
SN - 0149-7189
VL - 60
SP - 17
EP - 23
JO - Evaluation and Program Planning
JF - Evaluation and Program Planning
ER -