TY - JOUR
T1 - Resisting Puritans
AU - Van Engen, Abram
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Author(s).
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - This essay lays out five stages in the development of Puritan studies over the past three decades: Freestanding Puritanism, Diverse Puritanisms, Transatlantic Puritanism, Settler-Colonial Puritanism, and Persistent Puritanism. These categories map onto similar movements in early American studies more broadly. Having surveyed these developments, the essay spells out a few ways forward, looking specifically at Anne Bradstreet for inspiration (one of the oldest subjects in Puritan literary studies). Finally, the essay turns to the dominant paradigm of oppression and resistance, which guides early American studies more generally and Puritan studies in particular. The essay argues that this paradigm, while important and useful, could be nuanced and made even more useful if it took into consideration how the Puritans themselves understood and applied such categories - resisting and oppressing often in one and the same act. The Puritans set up constitutional constraints to limit and oppose authoritarianism, for example in their actions with the 1629 Charter of Massachusetts Bay. Yet in resisting authoritarianism, they also opened floodgates to white settler colonialism. The essay argues for understanding both aspects together and thinking through the legacies of each.
AB - This essay lays out five stages in the development of Puritan studies over the past three decades: Freestanding Puritanism, Diverse Puritanisms, Transatlantic Puritanism, Settler-Colonial Puritanism, and Persistent Puritanism. These categories map onto similar movements in early American studies more broadly. Having surveyed these developments, the essay spells out a few ways forward, looking specifically at Anne Bradstreet for inspiration (one of the oldest subjects in Puritan literary studies). Finally, the essay turns to the dominant paradigm of oppression and resistance, which guides early American studies more generally and Puritan studies in particular. The essay argues that this paradigm, while important and useful, could be nuanced and made even more useful if it took into consideration how the Puritans themselves understood and applied such categories - resisting and oppressing often in one and the same act. The Puritans set up constitutional constraints to limit and oppose authoritarianism, for example in their actions with the 1629 Charter of Massachusetts Bay. Yet in resisting authoritarianism, they also opened floodgates to white settler colonialism. The essay argues for understanding both aspects together and thinking through the legacies of each.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/86000492451
U2 - 10.1093/alh/ajae128
DO - 10.1093/alh/ajae128
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:86000492451
SN - 0896-7148
VL - 37
SP - 94
EP - 109
JO - American Literary History
JF - American Literary History
IS - 1
ER -