TY - JOUR
T1 - Repositories of biocultural diversity
T2 - Toward best practices for empowering ethnobotany in digital herbaria
AU - Hart, Robbie
AU - Fonseca-Kruel, Viviane
AU - Dalcin, Eduardo
AU - da Silva Luís Alexandre, Estevão
AU - Pace, Matthew
AU - Schmull, Michaela
AU - Beltran-Rodríguez, Leonardo
AU - Murguía-Romero, Miguel
AU - Flores-Camargo, Diana G.
AU - Mapes-Sánchez, Cristina
AU - Nesbitt, Mark
AU - Romero, Carolina
AU - Townesmith, Andrew
AU - Salick, Jan
AU - McAlvay, Alex
AU - Otero-Walker, Kenneth R.
AU - Balick, Michael J.
AU - Golan, Jacob
AU - Hoffman, Bruce
AU - Leonard, Kelsey
AU - Mattalia, Giulia
AU - Odonne, Guillaume
AU - Prehn, Aurora
AU - Vandebroek, Ina
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Author(s). Plants, People, Planet published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of New Phytologist Foundation.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - Societal Impact Statement: As herbaria digitize millions of plant specimens, ethnobotanical information associated with them is becoming increasingly accessible. These biocultural data include plant uses, names, and/or management practices of Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities (IPLCs). However, the absence of shared curatorial standards limits accessibility and use by IPLCs and others. We estimated and characterized ethnobotanical data associated with herbarium specimens and provide here key considerations for future work. We identified a proportionally small, yet collectively significant, number of ethnobotanical specimens, and call for coordinating best practices among global herbaria to locate, acknowledge, and responsibly share this information, together with source communities. Summary: As herbaria digitize millions of plant specimens, those containing biocultural information are becoming increasingly accessible. This information — also known as ethnobotanical data — holds both cultural and scientific value, and may include plant uses, vernacular names, local species concepts, cultural values, and plant management practices of Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities (IPLCs). However, the lack of coordinated curatorial standards currently limits both the accessibility and effective use of this information by IPLCs, ethnobotanists, and others. To address this gap, we quantitatively estimated and characterized ethnobotanical information associated with herbarium specimens and offer key considerations to guide future work. We identified a proportionally small —yet collectively significant— number of ethnobotanical specimens, comprising approximately 1.6% of all specimen records and representing hundreds of thousands of specimens in the surveyed herbaria. We advocate for coordinating best practices to locate, acknowledge, and ethically share this information among herbaria, working together with source communities and through global cooperation.
AB - Societal Impact Statement: As herbaria digitize millions of plant specimens, ethnobotanical information associated with them is becoming increasingly accessible. These biocultural data include plant uses, names, and/or management practices of Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities (IPLCs). However, the absence of shared curatorial standards limits accessibility and use by IPLCs and others. We estimated and characterized ethnobotanical data associated with herbarium specimens and provide here key considerations for future work. We identified a proportionally small, yet collectively significant, number of ethnobotanical specimens, and call for coordinating best practices among global herbaria to locate, acknowledge, and responsibly share this information, together with source communities. Summary: As herbaria digitize millions of plant specimens, those containing biocultural information are becoming increasingly accessible. This information — also known as ethnobotanical data — holds both cultural and scientific value, and may include plant uses, vernacular names, local species concepts, cultural values, and plant management practices of Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities (IPLCs). However, the lack of coordinated curatorial standards currently limits both the accessibility and effective use of this information by IPLCs, ethnobotanists, and others. To address this gap, we quantitatively estimated and characterized ethnobotanical information associated with herbarium specimens and offer key considerations to guide future work. We identified a proportionally small —yet collectively significant— number of ethnobotanical specimens, comprising approximately 1.6% of all specimen records and representing hundreds of thousands of specimens in the surveyed herbaria. We advocate for coordinating best practices to locate, acknowledge, and ethically share this information among herbaria, working together with source communities and through global cooperation.
KW - biocultural collections
KW - data sovereignty
KW - digitization
KW - ethnobiology
KW - indigenous and local knowledge
KW - languages
KW - plant taxonomy
KW - traditional ecological knowledge
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105009339911
U2 - 10.1002/ppp3.70052
DO - 10.1002/ppp3.70052
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105009339911
SN - 2572-2611
JO - Plants People Planet
JF - Plants People Planet
ER -