TY - JOUR
T1 - Repeatability of subjective refraction in myopic and keratoconic subjects
T2 - Results of vector analysis
AU - Raasch, Thomas W.
AU - Schechtman, Kenneth B.
AU - Davis, Larry J.
AU - Zadnik, Karla
N1 - Funding Information:
The Collaborative Longitudinal Evaluation of Keratoconus (CLEK) Study is supported by the National Eye Institute/National Institutes of Health, grants EY10419, EY10069, EY10077, EY12656, and EY02687. It also is supported by Conforma Contact Lenses, Paragon Vision Sciences, CIBA Vision Corporation, and the Ohio Lions Eye Research Foundation.
PY - 2001
Y1 - 2001
N2 - This paper evaluates the repeatability of refraction in keratoconus patients and normal myopes, using representations of spherocylindrical power that are theoretically valid. Data consist of test-retest refraction data from the Collaborative Longitudinal Evaluation of Keratoconus (CLEK) Study and similar data from normal myopes. Dioptric powers are transformed to an orthogonal vector representation of dioptric power. The metric of change is the dioptric difference between test and retest. The median difference between test and retest in keratoconus patients is four to six times larger than in normal myopes. Refraction over a rigid contact lens on a keratoconic cornea improves repeatability but remains approximately twice as large as in normal myopes. The methods demonstrated here possess advantages over previous methods and provide a more valid comparison between test and retest and between different subject groups. The repeatability of refraction in keratoconus patients is substantially worse than in normal myopes.
AB - This paper evaluates the repeatability of refraction in keratoconus patients and normal myopes, using representations of spherocylindrical power that are theoretically valid. Data consist of test-retest refraction data from the Collaborative Longitudinal Evaluation of Keratoconus (CLEK) Study and similar data from normal myopes. Dioptric powers are transformed to an orthogonal vector representation of dioptric power. The metric of change is the dioptric difference between test and retest. The median difference between test and retest in keratoconus patients is four to six times larger than in normal myopes. Refraction over a rigid contact lens on a keratoconic cornea improves repeatability but remains approximately twice as large as in normal myopes. The methods demonstrated here possess advantages over previous methods and provide a more valid comparison between test and retest and between different subject groups. The repeatability of refraction in keratoconus patients is substantially worse than in normal myopes.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034916285&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S0275-5408(00)00060-0
DO - 10.1016/S0275-5408(00)00060-0
M3 - Article
C2 - 11563425
AN - SCOPUS:0034916285
SN - 0275-5408
VL - 21
SP - 376
EP - 383
JO - Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics
JF - Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics
IS - 5
ER -