TY - JOUR
T1 - Remote Global Radiation Oncology Education and Training
T2 - A Pathway to Increase Access to High-Quality Radiation Therapy Services in Low- and Middle-Income Countries
AU - Kavuma, Awusi
AU - Kibudde, Solomon
AU - Schmidt, Matthew
AU - Zhao, Tianyu
AU - Gay, Hiram
AU - Li, Benjamin
AU - Michalski, Jeff
AU - Hugo, Geoffrey
AU - Vanchinbazar, Enkhtsetseg
AU - Minjgee, Minjmaa
AU - Nansalmaa, Erdenekhuu
AU - Ssewamala, Fred
AU - Velarde, Angel
AU - De Fella, Vicky
AU - Ixquiac, Milton
AU - Henke, Lauren
AU - van Rheenen, Jacaranda
AU - Sun, Baozhou
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Authors
PY - 2023/5/1
Y1 - 2023/5/1
N2 - Purpose: There is a vital need to train radiation therapy professionals in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) to develop sustainable cancer treatment capacity and infrastructure. LMICs have started to introduce intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), which is the standard of care in high-income countries, because of improved outcomes and reduced toxicities. This work reports the efficacy of a complementary asynchronous plus synchronous virtual-training approach on improving radiation therapy professions’ self-confidence levels and evaluating participants’ attitudes toward asynchronous and synchronous didactic hands-on learning in 3 LMICs. Methods and Materials: Training was provided to 37 participants from Uganda, Guatemala, and Mongolia, which included 4 theoretical lectures, 4 hands-on sessions, and 8 self-guided online videos. The 36-day training focused on IMRT contouring, site-specific target/organ definition, planning/optimization, and quality assurance. Participants completed pre- and postsession confidence surveys on a 0 to 10 scale, which was converted to a 5-point Likert rating scale to evaluate the training outcomes. The pros and cons of the 3 different training formats were compared. Results: The participants included 15 (40.5%) radiation oncologists, 11 (29.7%) medical physicists, 6 (16.2%) radiation therapists, and 5 (13.5%) dosimetrists. Approximately 50% had more than 10 years of radiation therapy experience, 70.8% had no formal IMRT training, and only 25% had IMRT at their institutions. The average experience and confidence levels in using IMRT at baseline were 3.2 and 2.9, which increased to 5.2 and 4.9 (P <.001) after the theoretical training. After the hands-on training, the experience and confidence levels further improved to 5.4 and 5.5 (P <.001). After the self-guided training, the confidence levels increased further to 6.9 (P <.01). Among the 3 different training sessions, hands-on trainings (58.3%) were most helpful for the development of participants’ IMRT skills, followed by theoretical sessions with 25%. Conclusions: After completing the training sessions, Uganda and Mongolia started IMRT treatments. Remote training provides an excellent and feasible e-learning platform to train radiation therapy professionals in LMICs. The training program improved the IMRT confidence levels and treatment delivery. The hands-on trainings were most preferred.
AB - Purpose: There is a vital need to train radiation therapy professionals in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) to develop sustainable cancer treatment capacity and infrastructure. LMICs have started to introduce intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), which is the standard of care in high-income countries, because of improved outcomes and reduced toxicities. This work reports the efficacy of a complementary asynchronous plus synchronous virtual-training approach on improving radiation therapy professions’ self-confidence levels and evaluating participants’ attitudes toward asynchronous and synchronous didactic hands-on learning in 3 LMICs. Methods and Materials: Training was provided to 37 participants from Uganda, Guatemala, and Mongolia, which included 4 theoretical lectures, 4 hands-on sessions, and 8 self-guided online videos. The 36-day training focused on IMRT contouring, site-specific target/organ definition, planning/optimization, and quality assurance. Participants completed pre- and postsession confidence surveys on a 0 to 10 scale, which was converted to a 5-point Likert rating scale to evaluate the training outcomes. The pros and cons of the 3 different training formats were compared. Results: The participants included 15 (40.5%) radiation oncologists, 11 (29.7%) medical physicists, 6 (16.2%) radiation therapists, and 5 (13.5%) dosimetrists. Approximately 50% had more than 10 years of radiation therapy experience, 70.8% had no formal IMRT training, and only 25% had IMRT at their institutions. The average experience and confidence levels in using IMRT at baseline were 3.2 and 2.9, which increased to 5.2 and 4.9 (P <.001) after the theoretical training. After the hands-on training, the experience and confidence levels further improved to 5.4 and 5.5 (P <.001). After the self-guided training, the confidence levels increased further to 6.9 (P <.01). Among the 3 different training sessions, hands-on trainings (58.3%) were most helpful for the development of participants’ IMRT skills, followed by theoretical sessions with 25%. Conclusions: After completing the training sessions, Uganda and Mongolia started IMRT treatments. Remote training provides an excellent and feasible e-learning platform to train radiation therapy professionals in LMICs. The training program improved the IMRT confidence levels and treatment delivery. The hands-on trainings were most preferred.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85150770943&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.adro.2023.101180
DO - 10.1016/j.adro.2023.101180
M3 - Article
C2 - 36846439
AN - SCOPUS:85150770943
SN - 2452-1094
VL - 8
JO - Advances in Radiation Oncology
JF - Advances in Radiation Oncology
IS - 3
M1 - 101180
ER -