Abstract
In this paper two types of crossbar architecture, i.e. one-turn crossbar and deflection crossbar, are compared in light of reliability over a single fault. The analysis results show the one-turn crossbar architecture is slightly more robust than the deflection crossbar architecture for a single fault. We also propose a distributed fault recovery algorithm for the case of the deflection crossbar. Simulations show that the overall average cell loss is reduced by 32.6% when the algorithm is applied with a traffic intensity of 0.7. The required minimum clock rate with the recovery algorithm is calculated to be increased by 28.8% compared to the one without the algorithm.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages | 227-231 |
| Number of pages | 5 |
| State | Published - 1997 |
| Event | Proceedings of the 1997 IEEE Global Telecommunications Mini-Conference - Phoenix, AZ, USA Duration: Nov 3 1997 → Nov 8 1997 |
Conference
| Conference | Proceedings of the 1997 IEEE Global Telecommunications Mini-Conference |
|---|---|
| City | Phoenix, AZ, USA |
| Period | 11/3/97 → 11/8/97 |