Relative efficiency of equal versus unequal cluster sizes in cluster randomized trials with a small number of clusters

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

To calculate sample sizes in cluster randomized trials (CRTs), the cluster sizes are usually assumed to be identical across all clusters for simplicity. However, equal cluster sizes are not guaranteed in practice, especially when the number of clusters is limited. Therefore, it is important to understand the relative efficiency (RE) of equal versus unequal cluster sizes when designing CRTs with a limited number of clusters. In this paper, we are interested in the RE of two bias-corrected sandwich estimators of the treatment effect in the Generalized Estimating Equation (GEE) models for CRTs with a small number of clusters. Specifically, we derive the RE of two bias-corrected sandwich estimators for binary, continuous, or count data in CRTs under the assumption of an exchangeable working correlation structure. We consider different scenarios of cluster size distributions and investigate RE performance through simulation studies. We conclude that the number of clusters could be increased by as much as 42% to compensate for efficiency loss due to unequal cluster sizes. Finally, we propose an algorithm of increasing the number of clusters when the coefficient of variation of cluster sizes is known and unknown.

Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2020

Keywords

  • Bias-corrected sandwich estimator
  • cluster randomized trial (CRT)
  • generalized estimating equation (GEE)
  • intracluster correlation coefficient (ICC)
  • relative efficiency (RE)

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Relative efficiency of equal versus unequal cluster sizes in cluster randomized trials with a small number of clusters'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this