Relative disagreement among different software packages in PET-flow quantitation: An appeal for consistency

Thomas H. Schindler; Ines Valenta

doi:10.1007/s12350-019-01633-y

Relative disagreement among different software packages in PET-flow quantitation: An appeal for consistency

Thomas H. Schindler
, Ines Valenta

Division of Nuclear Medicine

Research output: Contribution to journal › Editorial

1 Scopus citations

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	1234-1236
Number of pages	3
Journal	Journal of Nuclear Cardiology
Volume	27
Issue number	4
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-019-01633-y
State	Published - Aug 1 2020

Access to Document

10.1007/s12350-019-01633-y

Cite this

@article{6a3e46257a5642ae95be22e36e43bef6,

title = "Relative disagreement among different software packages in PET-flow quantitation: An appeal for consistency",

author = "Schindler, \{Thomas H.\} and Ines Valenta",

note = "Funding Information: Thomas H. Schindler was financially supported by Advanced Accelerator Applications, Geneva, Switzerland. Ines Valenta has nothing to disclose.",

year = "2020",

month = aug,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1007/s12350-019-01633-y",

language = "English",

volume = "27",

pages = "1234--1236",

journal = "Journal of Nuclear Cardiology",

issn = "1071-3581",

number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Relative disagreement among different software packages in PET-flow quantitation

T2 - An appeal for consistency

AU - Schindler, Thomas H.

AU - Valenta, Ines

N1 - Funding Information: Thomas H. Schindler was financially supported by Advanced Accelerator Applications, Geneva, Switzerland. Ines Valenta has nothing to disclose.

PY - 2020/8/1

Y1 - 2020/8/1

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85073968310

U2 - 10.1007/s12350-019-01633-y

DO - 10.1007/s12350-019-01633-y

M3 - Editorial

C2 - 30903607

AN - SCOPUS:85073968310

SN - 1071-3581

VL - 27

SP - 1234

EP - 1236

JO - Journal of Nuclear Cardiology

JF - Journal of Nuclear Cardiology

IS - 4

ER -

Relative disagreement among different software packages in PET-flow quantitation: An appeal for consistency

Access to Document

Other files and links

Cite this