TY - JOUR
T1 - Relationship between specialty choice and medical student temperament and character assessed with cloninger inventory
AU - Vaidya, Nutan Atre
AU - Sierles, Frederick S.
AU - Raida, Michael D.
AU - Fakhoury, Faris J.
AU - Przybeck, Thomas R.
AU - Cloninger, C. Robert
PY - 2004
Y1 - 2004
N2 - Background: Multiple variables affect medical specialty choice, including temperament, sociodemographic factors, and personal experiences. Many studies address specific variables for specific specialties, but few assess the relative impact of each factor. Purpose: To identify the relative influence of temperament in choosing a specialty. Methods: A sociodemographic and personal experiences questionnaire and a 240-question temperament and character inventory was distributed to 682 medical students. Their scores for 6 medical specialties were examined using analyses of variance, multivariate analyses of variance, and discriminant analysis. Results: Students choosing surgery, emergency medicine, and obstetrics and gynecology were higher on novelty seeking than other students. Future surgeons were lower in harm avoidance and reward dependence (RD) than the others. Students choosing primary care specialties, emergency medicine, and obstetrics and gynecology were all high on RD; with pediatrics being highest. Students differed from college students, the women differed from the men, and the Asian Americans differed from the other groups. Conclusion: The implications of these findings are discussed for career counseling and future research.
AB - Background: Multiple variables affect medical specialty choice, including temperament, sociodemographic factors, and personal experiences. Many studies address specific variables for specific specialties, but few assess the relative impact of each factor. Purpose: To identify the relative influence of temperament in choosing a specialty. Methods: A sociodemographic and personal experiences questionnaire and a 240-question temperament and character inventory was distributed to 682 medical students. Their scores for 6 medical specialties were examined using analyses of variance, multivariate analyses of variance, and discriminant analysis. Results: Students choosing surgery, emergency medicine, and obstetrics and gynecology were higher on novelty seeking than other students. Future surgeons were lower in harm avoidance and reward dependence (RD) than the others. Students choosing primary care specialties, emergency medicine, and obstetrics and gynecology were all high on RD; with pediatrics being highest. Students differed from college students, the women differed from the men, and the Asian Americans differed from the other groups. Conclusion: The implications of these findings are discussed for career counseling and future research.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=3042773497&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1207/s15328015tlm1602_6
DO - 10.1207/s15328015tlm1602_6
M3 - Article
C2 - 15294460
AN - SCOPUS:3042773497
SN - 1040-1334
VL - 16
SP - 150
EP - 156
JO - Teaching and Learning in Medicine
JF - Teaching and Learning in Medicine
IS - 2
ER -