TY - JOUR
T1 - Relation between dietary linolenic acid and coronary artery disease in the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Family Heart Study
AU - Djoussé, Luc
AU - Pankow, James S.
AU - Eckfeldt, John H.
AU - Folsom, Aaron R.
AU - Hopkins, Paul N.
AU - Province, Michael A.
AU - Hong, Yuling
AU - Ellison, R. Curtis
PY - 2001
Y1 - 2001
N2 - Background: Epidemiologic studies suggest that a higher consumption of eicosapentaenoic acid and docosahexaenoic acid is associated with a reduced risk of cardiovascular disease. Studies in humans and animals also reported an inverse association between α-linolenic acid and cardiovascular disease morbidity and mortality. Objective: We examined the relation between dietary linolenic acid and prevalent coronary artery disease (CAD). Design: We studied 4584 participants with a mean (±SD) age of 52.1 ± 13.7 y in the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Family Heart Study in a cross-sectional design. Participants' diets were assessed with a semiquantitative food-frequency questionnaire. For each sex, we created age- and energy-adjusted quintiles of linolenic acid, and we used logistic regression to estimate prevalent odds ratios for CAD. Results: From the lowest to the highest quintile of linolenic acid, the prevalence odds ratios of CAD were 1.0, 0.77, 0.61, 0.58, and 0.60 for the men (P for trend = 0.012) and 1.0, 0.57, 0.52, 0.30, and 0.42 for the women (P for trend = 0.014) after adjustment for age, linoleic acid, and anthropometric, lifestyle, and metabolic factors. Linoleic acid was also inversely related to the prevalence odds ratios of CAD in the multivariate model (0.60 and 0.61 in the second and third tertiles, respectively) after adjustment for linolenic acid. The combined effect of linoleic and linolenic acids was stronger than the individual effects of either fatty acid. Conclusions: A higher intake of either linolenic or linoleic acid was inversely related to the prevalence odds ratio of CAD. The 2 fatty acids had synergistic effects on the prevalence odds ratio of CAD.
AB - Background: Epidemiologic studies suggest that a higher consumption of eicosapentaenoic acid and docosahexaenoic acid is associated with a reduced risk of cardiovascular disease. Studies in humans and animals also reported an inverse association between α-linolenic acid and cardiovascular disease morbidity and mortality. Objective: We examined the relation between dietary linolenic acid and prevalent coronary artery disease (CAD). Design: We studied 4584 participants with a mean (±SD) age of 52.1 ± 13.7 y in the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Family Heart Study in a cross-sectional design. Participants' diets were assessed with a semiquantitative food-frequency questionnaire. For each sex, we created age- and energy-adjusted quintiles of linolenic acid, and we used logistic regression to estimate prevalent odds ratios for CAD. Results: From the lowest to the highest quintile of linolenic acid, the prevalence odds ratios of CAD were 1.0, 0.77, 0.61, 0.58, and 0.60 for the men (P for trend = 0.012) and 1.0, 0.57, 0.52, 0.30, and 0.42 for the women (P for trend = 0.014) after adjustment for age, linoleic acid, and anthropometric, lifestyle, and metabolic factors. Linoleic acid was also inversely related to the prevalence odds ratios of CAD in the multivariate model (0.60 and 0.61 in the second and third tertiles, respectively) after adjustment for linolenic acid. The combined effect of linoleic and linolenic acids was stronger than the individual effects of either fatty acid. Conclusions: A higher intake of either linolenic or linoleic acid was inversely related to the prevalence odds ratio of CAD. The 2 fatty acids had synergistic effects on the prevalence odds ratio of CAD.
KW - Coronary artery disease
KW - Diet
KW - Food-frequency questionnaire
KW - Linoleic acid
KW - Linolenic acid
KW - N-3 fatty acids
KW - N-6 fatty acids
KW - National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Family Heart Study
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034748162&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/ajcn/74.5.612
DO - 10.1093/ajcn/74.5.612
M3 - Article
C2 - 11684529
AN - SCOPUS:0034748162
SN - 0002-9165
VL - 74
SP - 612
EP - 619
JO - American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
JF - American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
IS - 5
ER -