Recurrent urinary tract infection and risk of bladder cancer in the Nijmegen bladder cancer study

S. H. Vermeulen, N. Hanum, A. J. Grotenhuis, G. Castaño-Vinyals, A. G. Van Der Heijden, K. K. Aben, I. U. Mysorekar, L. A. Kiemeney

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

91 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background:Controversy exists on whether urinary tract infection (UTI) is a risk factor for urinary bladder cancer (UBC). Here, the association is investigated using data from one of the largest bladder cancer case-control studies worldwide.Methods:Information on (i) history and age at onset of regular cystitis ('regular low-UTI') and (ii) number and age at onset of UTI treated with antibiotics ('UTI-ab') from 1809 UBC patients and 4370 controls was analysed. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) adjusted for age, education, smoking, and use of aspirin/ibuprofen were generated, for men and women separately.Results:Regular low-UTI was associated with an increased UBC risk (men: OR (95% CI) 6.6 (4.2-11); women: 2.7 (2.0-3.5)), with stronger effects in muscle-invasive UBC. Statistically significant decreased risks (ORs ∼0.65) were observed for up to five UTI-ab, specifically in those who (had) smoked and experienced UTI-ab at a younger age. In women, UTI experienced after menopause was associated with a higher UBC risk, irrespective of the number of episodes.Conclusions:Regular cystitis is positively associated with UBC risk. In contrast, a limited number of episodes of UTI treated with antibiotics is associated with decreased UBC risk, but not in never-smokers and postmenopausal women.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)594-600
Number of pages7
JournalBritish Journal of Cancer
Volume112
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 3 2015

Keywords

  • bladder infection
  • urinary bladder cancer
  • urinary tract infection
  • urothelial carcinoma

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Recurrent urinary tract infection and risk of bladder cancer in the Nijmegen bladder cancer study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this