Reconsidering domestication from a process archaeology perspective

  • Amy Bogaard
  • , Robin Allaby
  • , Benjamin S. Arbuckle
  • , Robin Bendrey
  • , Sarah Crowley
  • , Thomas Cucchi
  • , Tim Denham
  • , Laurent Frantz
  • , Dorian Fuller
  • , Tom Gilbert
  • , Elinor Karlsson
  • , Aurélie Manin
  • , Fiona Marshall
  • , Natalie Mueller
  • , Joris Peters
  • , Charles Stépanoff
  • , Alexander Weide
  • , Greger Larson

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    66 Scopus citations

    Abstract

    Process philosophy offers a metaphysical foundation for domestication studies. This grounding is especially important given the European colonialist origin of ‘domestication’ as a term and 19th century cultural project. We explore the potential of process archaeology for deep-time investigation of domestication relationships, drawing attention to the variable pace of domestication as an ongoing process within and across taxa; the nature of domestication ‘syndromes’ and ‘pathways’ as general hypotheses about process; the importance of cooperation as well as competition among humans and other organisms; the significance of non-human agency; and the ubiquity of hybrid communities that resist the simple wild/domestic dichotomy.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)56-77
    Number of pages22
    JournalWorld Archaeology
    Volume53
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    StatePublished - 2021

    Keywords

    • Domestication
    • agriculture
    • herding
    • hybridity
    • niche
    • process

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Reconsidering domestication from a process archaeology perspective'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this