TY - JOUR
T1 - Re-examining phone counseling for smoking cessation
T2 - Does the evidence apply to low-SES smokers?
AU - Garg, Rachel
AU - McQueen, Amy
AU - Evbuoma-Fike, Ebuwa I.
AU - Kreuter, Matthew W.
N1 - Funding Information:
Funding for this study was provided by the National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health under Award nos. R01CA201429 and R01CA235773 . The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2022/7
Y1 - 2022/7
N2 - Introduction: A 2019 Cochrane review concluded telephone counseling is an effective intervention for smoking cessation. However, the review did not assess the role of socioeconomic status (SES) indicators on the effectiveness of telephone counseling. Methods: We reviewed 65 U.S. studies from the Cochrane review. We abstracted data on education, income, employment status and insurance status, and examined associations with targeted recruitment, intervention uptake, attrition, and cessation outcomes. Results: Except for education, SES indicators were seldom reported or used in analysis: 61 studies reported education, 24 reported insurance status, 23 reported employment status, and 17 reported income. Nine studies exclusively recruited low-SES samples. Thirteen studies examined associations between SES and smoking cessation. Among these, two reported lower education predicted greater cessation and two reported higher education predicted greater cessation. Other studies found higher income (n = 2) or employment type (n = 1) predicted cessation. Conclusions: Evidence supporting telephone counseling for cessation is less clear when applied to low-SES smokers. Future research should directly assess intervention effectiveness in this priority population. Practice implications: Given the evidence, it may be hard to justify future studies not focusing on low-SES populations. Innovative counseling solutions from providers helping low-income smokers quit should be evaluated to inform best practice.
AB - Introduction: A 2019 Cochrane review concluded telephone counseling is an effective intervention for smoking cessation. However, the review did not assess the role of socioeconomic status (SES) indicators on the effectiveness of telephone counseling. Methods: We reviewed 65 U.S. studies from the Cochrane review. We abstracted data on education, income, employment status and insurance status, and examined associations with targeted recruitment, intervention uptake, attrition, and cessation outcomes. Results: Except for education, SES indicators were seldom reported or used in analysis: 61 studies reported education, 24 reported insurance status, 23 reported employment status, and 17 reported income. Nine studies exclusively recruited low-SES samples. Thirteen studies examined associations between SES and smoking cessation. Among these, two reported lower education predicted greater cessation and two reported higher education predicted greater cessation. Other studies found higher income (n = 2) or employment type (n = 1) predicted cessation. Conclusions: Evidence supporting telephone counseling for cessation is less clear when applied to low-SES smokers. Future research should directly assess intervention effectiveness in this priority population. Practice implications: Given the evidence, it may be hard to justify future studies not focusing on low-SES populations. Innovative counseling solutions from providers helping low-income smokers quit should be evaluated to inform best practice.
KW - Health disparities
KW - Intervention
KW - Smoking cessation
KW - Special populations
KW - Telephone counseling
KW - Tobacco
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85119407363&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.pec.2021.11.008
DO - 10.1016/j.pec.2021.11.008
M3 - Review article
C2 - 34815137
AN - SCOPUS:85119407363
VL - 105
SP - 1783
EP - 1792
JO - Patient Education and Counseling
JF - Patient Education and Counseling
SN - 0738-3991
IS - 7
ER -