Rational choice theory and explanation

Frank Lovett

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    72 Scopus citations

    Abstract

    Much of the debate concerning rational choice theory (RCT) is fruitless because many people (both critics and defenders) fail to correctly understand the role it plays in developing explanations of social phenomena. For the most part, people view rational choice theory as a species of intentional explanation; on the best available understanding, however, it should be viewed as contributing to the construction of straightforward causal explanations. Debate concerning RCT can progress in a worthwhile manner only once this point is correctly understood. Once it is, many common critiques are easily answered, but at the same time, the ambitions of some rational choice theorists are deflated.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)237-272
    Number of pages36
    JournalRationality and Society
    Volume18
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    StatePublished - May 2006

    Keywords

    • Game theory
    • Methodological individualism
    • Social science epistemology
    • Utility theory

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Rational choice theory and explanation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this