TY - JOUR
T1 - Randomized trial of lenalidomide alone versus lenalidomide plus rituximab in patients with recurrent follicular lymphoma
T2 - CALGB 50401 (Alliance)
AU - Leonard, John P.
AU - Jung, Sin Ho
AU - Johnson, Jeffrey
AU - Pitcher, Brandelyn N.
AU - Bartlett, Nancy L.
AU - Blum, Kristie A.
AU - Czuczman, Myron
AU - Giguere, Jeffrey K.
AU - Cheson, Bruce D.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 American Society of Clinical Oncology. All rights reserved.
PY - 2015/11/1
Y1 - 2015/11/1
N2 - Purpose: Lenalidomide and rituximab (LR) are active agents in follicular lymphoma (FL). Combination regimens have not been previously assessed in randomized studies. Patients and Methods: The Cancer and Leukemia Group B (Alliance) 50401 trial is a randomized phase II trial studying rituximab (375 mg/m2 weekly for 4 weeks), lenalidomide (15 mg per day on days 1 to 21, followed by 7 days of rest, in cycle 1 and then 20 mg per day on days 1 to 21, followed by 7 days of rest, in cycles 2 to 12), or LR. The rituximab-alone arm was discontinued as a result of poor accrual Eligibility included recurrent FL and prior rituximab with time to progression of > 6 months from last dose. Aspirin or heparin was recommended for patients at high thrombosis risk. Results: Ninety-one patients (lenalidomide, n = 45; LR, n = 46) received treatment; median age was 63 years (range, 34 to 89 years), and 58% were intermediate or high risk according to the Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index. In the lenalidomide and LR arms, grade 3 to 4 adverse events occurred in 58% and 53% of patients, with 9% and 11% of patients experiencing grade 4 toxicity, respectively; grade 3 to 4 adverse events included neutropenia (16% v20%, respectively), fatigue (9% v 13%, respectively), and thrombosis (16% [n = 7] v 4% [n = 2], respectively; P = 157). Thirty-six percent of lenalidomide patients and 63% of LR patients completed 12 cycles Lenalidomide alone was associated with more treatment failures, with 22% of patients discontinuing treatment as a result of adverse events. Dose-intensity exceeded 80% in both arms. Overall response rate was 53% (20% complete response) and 76% (39% complete response) for lenalidomide alone and LR, respectively (P = .029). At the median follow-up of 2.5 years, median time to progression was 1.1 year for lenalidomide alone and 2 years for LR (P = .0023). Conclusion: LR is more active than lenalidomide alone in recurrent FL with similar toxicity, warranting further study in B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma as a platform for addition of novel agents.
AB - Purpose: Lenalidomide and rituximab (LR) are active agents in follicular lymphoma (FL). Combination regimens have not been previously assessed in randomized studies. Patients and Methods: The Cancer and Leukemia Group B (Alliance) 50401 trial is a randomized phase II trial studying rituximab (375 mg/m2 weekly for 4 weeks), lenalidomide (15 mg per day on days 1 to 21, followed by 7 days of rest, in cycle 1 and then 20 mg per day on days 1 to 21, followed by 7 days of rest, in cycles 2 to 12), or LR. The rituximab-alone arm was discontinued as a result of poor accrual Eligibility included recurrent FL and prior rituximab with time to progression of > 6 months from last dose. Aspirin or heparin was recommended for patients at high thrombosis risk. Results: Ninety-one patients (lenalidomide, n = 45; LR, n = 46) received treatment; median age was 63 years (range, 34 to 89 years), and 58% were intermediate or high risk according to the Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index. In the lenalidomide and LR arms, grade 3 to 4 adverse events occurred in 58% and 53% of patients, with 9% and 11% of patients experiencing grade 4 toxicity, respectively; grade 3 to 4 adverse events included neutropenia (16% v20%, respectively), fatigue (9% v 13%, respectively), and thrombosis (16% [n = 7] v 4% [n = 2], respectively; P = 157). Thirty-six percent of lenalidomide patients and 63% of LR patients completed 12 cycles Lenalidomide alone was associated with more treatment failures, with 22% of patients discontinuing treatment as a result of adverse events. Dose-intensity exceeded 80% in both arms. Overall response rate was 53% (20% complete response) and 76% (39% complete response) for lenalidomide alone and LR, respectively (P = .029). At the median follow-up of 2.5 years, median time to progression was 1.1 year for lenalidomide alone and 2 years for LR (P = .0023). Conclusion: LR is more active than lenalidomide alone in recurrent FL with similar toxicity, warranting further study in B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma as a platform for addition of novel agents.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84944960450&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1200/JCO.2014.59.9258
DO - 10.1200/JCO.2014.59.9258
M3 - Article
C2 - 26304886
AN - SCOPUS:84944960450
SN - 0732-183X
VL - 33
SP - 3635
EP - 3640
JO - Journal of Clinical Oncology
JF - Journal of Clinical Oncology
IS - 31
ER -